Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yeo, Stedston

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Failure analysis of a failed anchor chain link12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sridhar, Idapalapati
1 / 1 shared
Akisanya, Alfred R.
1 / 17 shared
Loh, Kelvin
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sridhar, Idapalapati
  • Akisanya, Alfred R.
  • Loh, Kelvin
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Failure analysis of a failed anchor chain link

  • Sridhar, Idapalapati
  • Akisanya, Alfred R.
  • Loh, Kelvin
  • Yeo, Stedston
Abstract

The failure of a metal chain link with stud during an anchoring operation of a ship is examined. Visual observation, optical and scanning electron microscopy analyses of the fracture surfaces in combination with hardness and tensile tests are used to establish the cause of failure.The chemical element composition, tensile strength, yield strength and elongation of the base metal of the chain link are within the recommended design values.However, cross-sectional microstructure examination revealed that the fracture occurred along the flash butt weld and initiated from a pre-existing edge radial crack on the outer surface which had been painted over.The presence of inclusions near the outer surface, decarburized boundaries of the inclusions and decarburized thin strip along the entire weldment had resulted in reduction in the strength of the weldment and subsequent initiation of the surface crack.The main cause of the chain link failure is improper flash welding and heat treatment resulting in localised carbide segregations and embrittlement, leading to initiation of surface crack and consequent overload of the remaining net-section area of the chain. There was no evidence of fatigue crack growth.Better inspection and maintenance would have led to early detection of the surface crack during any the periodic non-destructive testing.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • inclusion
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • carbide
  • fatigue
  • hardness
  • yield strength
  • tensile strength