Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Broer, Agnes A. R.

  • Google
  • 11
  • 12
  • 172

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2023Intelligent Health Indicators Based on Semi-supervised Learning Utilizing Acoustic Emission Data3citations
  • 2023Hierarchical Upscaling of Data-Driven Damage Diagnostics for Stiffened Composite Aircraft Structurescitations
  • 2023Intelligent health indicator construction for prognostics of composite structures utilizing a semi-supervised deep neural network and SHM data45citations
  • 2023An SHM Data-Driven Methodology for the Remaining Useful Life Prognosis of Aeronautical Subcomponents6citations
  • 2023A novel strain-based health indicator for the remaining useful life estimation of degrading composite structures11citations
  • 2022On the Challenges of Upscaling Damage Monitoring Methodologies for Stiffened Composite Aircraft Panels2citations
  • 2022Assessing stiffness degradation of stiffened composite panels in post-buckling compression-compression fatigue using guided waves24citations
  • 2021A Strain-Based Health Indicator for the SHM of Skin-to-Stringer Disbond Growth of Composite Stiffened Panels in Fatigue10citations
  • 2021Health monitoring of aerospace structures utilizing novel health indicators extracted from complex strain and acoustic emission data26citations
  • 2021Fusion-based damage diagnostics for stiffened composite panels37citations
  • 2021Health indicators for diagnostics and prognostics of composite aerospace structures8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Benedictus, Rinze
5 / 27 shared
Zarouchas, Dimitrios
11 / 30 shared
Moradi, Morteza
2 / 11 shared
Chiachío, Juan
2 / 7 shared
Loutas, Theodoros
9 / 13 shared
Galanopoulos, Georgios
8 / 10 shared
Yue, Nan
3 / 3 shared
Loutas, Theodoros H.
1 / 2 shared
Milanoski, Dimitrios
5 / 6 shared
Eleftheroglou, Nick
2 / 2 shared
Briand, William
1 / 2 shared
Rébillat, Marc
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Zarouchas, Dimitrios
  • Moradi, Morteza
  • Chiachío, Juan
  • Loutas, Theodoros
  • Galanopoulos, Georgios
  • Yue, Nan
  • Loutas, Theodoros H.
  • Milanoski, Dimitrios
  • Eleftheroglou, Nick
  • Briand, William
  • Rébillat, Marc
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Intelligent health indicator construction for prognostics of composite structures utilizing a semi-supervised deep neural network and SHM data

  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Loutas, Theodoros H.
  • Zarouchas, Dimitrios
  • Moradi, Morteza
  • Chiachío, Juan
  • Broer, Agnes A. R.
Abstract

<p>A health indicator (HI) is a valuable index demonstrating the health level of an engineering system or structure, which is a direct intermediate connection between raw signals collected by structural health monitoring (SHM) methods and prognostic models for remaining useful life estimation. An appropriate HI should conform to prognostic criteria, i.e., monotonicity, trendability, and prognosability, that are commonly utilized to measure the HI's quality. However, constructing such a HI is challenging, particularly for composite structures due to their vulnerability to complex damage scenarios. Data-driven models and deep learning are powerful mathematical tools that can be employed to achieve this purpose. Yet the availability of a large dataset with labels plays a crucial role in these fields, and the data collected by SHM methods can only be labeled after the structure fails. In this respect, semi-supervised learning can incorporate unlabeled data monitored from structures that have not yet failed. In the present work, a semi-supervised deep neural network is proposed to construct HI by SHM data fusion. For the first time, the prognostic criteria are used as targets of the network rather than employing them only as a measurement tool of HI's quality. In this regard, the acoustic emission method was used to monitor composite panels during fatigue loading, and extracted features were used to construct an intelligent HI. Finally, the proposed roadmap is evaluated by the holdout method, which shows a 77.3% improvement in the HI's quality, and the leave-one-out cross-validation method, which indicates the generalized model has at least an 81.77% score on the prognostic criteria. This study demonstrates that even when the true HI labels are unknown but the qualified HI pattern (according to the prognostic criteria) can be recognized, a model can still be built that provides HIs aligning with the desired degradation behavior.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • fatigue
  • composite
  • acoustic emission