Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Moradi, Morteza

  • Google
  • 11
  • 15
  • 128

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2024Innovative welding integration of acousto-ultrasonic composite transducers onto thermoplastic composite structures1citations
  • 2023Intelligent Health Indicators Based on Semi-supervised Learning Utilizing Acoustic Emission Data3citations
  • 2023Acousto-ultrasonic composite transducers integration into thermoplastic composite structures via ultrasonic weldingcitations
  • 2023Intelligent health indicator construction for prognostics of composite structures utilizing a semi-supervised deep neural network and SHM data45citations
  • 2023Developing health indicators for composite structures based on a two-stage semi-supervised machine learning model using acoustic emission data2citations
  • 2023Delamination Size Prediction for Compressive Fatigue Loaded Composite Structures Via Ultrasonic Guided Wave Based Structural Health Monitoringcitations
  • 2021Effect of honeycomb core on free vibration analysis of fiber metal laminate (FML) beams compared to conventional composites18citations
  • 2020Investigation of nonlinear post-buckling delamination in curved laminated composite panels via cohesive zone model26citations
  • 2019Edge disbond detection of carbon/epoxy repair patch on aluminum using thermography27citations
  • 2019Numerical and experimental study for assessing stress in carbon epoxy composites using thermography6citations
  • 2019Post buckling behavior analysis of unidirectional saddle shaped composite panels containing delaminations using cohesive zone modelingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zarouchas, Dimitrios
6 / 30 shared
Galiana, Shankar
2 / 3 shared
Wierach, Peter
2 / 44 shared
Benedictus, Rinze
3 / 27 shared
Chiachío, Juan
3 / 7 shared
Broer, Agnes A. R.
2 / 11 shared
Loutas, Theodoros H.
1 / 2 shared
Hadjria, Rafik
1 / 2 shared
Gul, Ferda Cansu
1 / 1 shared
Lugovtsova, Yevgeniya
1 / 7 shared
Talebitooti, Roohollah
1 / 1 shared
Ameri, Behnam
2 / 2 shared
Safizadeh, Mir Saeed
2 / 2 shared
Bayat, M.
1 / 8 shared
Mohammadi, Bijan
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zarouchas, Dimitrios
  • Galiana, Shankar
  • Wierach, Peter
  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Chiachío, Juan
  • Broer, Agnes A. R.
  • Loutas, Theodoros H.
  • Hadjria, Rafik
  • Gul, Ferda Cansu
  • Lugovtsova, Yevgeniya
  • Talebitooti, Roohollah
  • Ameri, Behnam
  • Safizadeh, Mir Saeed
  • Bayat, M.
  • Mohammadi, Bijan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Intelligent health indicator construction for prognostics of composite structures utilizing a semi-supervised deep neural network and SHM data

  • Benedictus, Rinze
  • Loutas, Theodoros H.
  • Zarouchas, Dimitrios
  • Moradi, Morteza
  • Chiachío, Juan
  • Broer, Agnes A. R.
Abstract

<p>A health indicator (HI) is a valuable index demonstrating the health level of an engineering system or structure, which is a direct intermediate connection between raw signals collected by structural health monitoring (SHM) methods and prognostic models for remaining useful life estimation. An appropriate HI should conform to prognostic criteria, i.e., monotonicity, trendability, and prognosability, that are commonly utilized to measure the HI's quality. However, constructing such a HI is challenging, particularly for composite structures due to their vulnerability to complex damage scenarios. Data-driven models and deep learning are powerful mathematical tools that can be employed to achieve this purpose. Yet the availability of a large dataset with labels plays a crucial role in these fields, and the data collected by SHM methods can only be labeled after the structure fails. In this respect, semi-supervised learning can incorporate unlabeled data monitored from structures that have not yet failed. In the present work, a semi-supervised deep neural network is proposed to construct HI by SHM data fusion. For the first time, the prognostic criteria are used as targets of the network rather than employing them only as a measurement tool of HI's quality. In this regard, the acoustic emission method was used to monitor composite panels during fatigue loading, and extracted features were used to construct an intelligent HI. Finally, the proposed roadmap is evaluated by the holdout method, which shows a 77.3% improvement in the HI's quality, and the leave-one-out cross-validation method, which indicates the generalized model has at least an 81.77% score on the prognostic criteria. This study demonstrates that even when the true HI labels are unknown but the qualified HI pattern (according to the prognostic criteria) can be recognized, a model can still be built that provides HIs aligning with the desired degradation behavior.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • fatigue
  • composite
  • acoustic emission