Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Furness, Liam

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 24

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Operando characterization of active surface area and passivation effects on sulfur-carbon composites for lithium-sulfur batteries12citations
  • 2022Operando characterization of active surface area and passivation effects on sulfur-carbon composites for lithium-sulfur batteries12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Garcia-Araez, Nuria
2 / 11 shared
Brandell, Daniel
2 / 26 shared
Lampkin, John
2 / 5 shared
Chien, Yu-Chuan
2 / 9 shared
Lacey, Matthew
2 / 4 shared
Li, He
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Garcia-Araez, Nuria
  • Brandell, Daniel
  • Lampkin, John
  • Chien, Yu-Chuan
  • Lacey, Matthew
  • Li, He
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Operando characterization of active surface area and passivation effects on sulfur-carbon composites for lithium-sulfur batteries

  • Garcia-Araez, Nuria
  • Brandell, Daniel
  • Lampkin, John
  • Chien, Yu-Chuan
  • Lacey, Matthew
  • Furness, Liam
Abstract

Sulfur electrodes for lithium-sulfur batteries necessarily contain a conductive additive, typically carbon, to enable the electrochemical reactions, since sulfur and the discharge product, Li2S, are insulators. Consequently, the full passivation of carbon, by deposition of sulfur and/or Li2S, would necessarily produce the death of the battery. However, here we demonstrate that for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries operated under lean electrolyte conditions (electrolyte to sulfur ratio of 6 µL mgS−1 in Li-S coin cells), the extent of passivation of carbon is not severe enough to limit performance. This is shown by performing impedance measurements of fully charged lithium-sulfur batteries, from which we demonstrate that we can evaluate the specific surface area of carbon, and we find that the capacity fade with cycling is not due to a decrease in the electrochemically active surface area of carbon. These results show that introducing a higher surface area carbon in the sulfur electrode formulation is not needed to prevent passivation, and that the focus of lithium-sulfur development should be directed towards other issues, such as mitigating undesirable reactions at the lithium electrode and achieving robust sulfur electrode structures enabling fast transport of electrolyte species and, thus, more homogeneous reactions.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • composite
  • Lithium