| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jensen, Pernille Erland
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2024Oxidation of sulfides from secondary materials in cementitious binders as a function of environmental conditions
- 2024Electrodialytic extraction of copper, lead and zinc from sulfide mine tailings:Optimization of current density and operation time
- 2021Screening for key material parameters affecting early-age and mechanical properties of blended cementitious binders with mine tailingscitations
- 2019Evaluation of mine tailings’ potential as supplementary cementitious materials based on chemical, mineralogical and physical characteristicscitations
- 2017The influence of sediment properties and experimental variables on the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of metals from sedimentcitations
- 2016Degradation of oil products in a soil from a Russian Barents hot-spot during electrodialytic remediationcitations
- 2016Wood ash used as partly sand and/or cement replacement in mortarcitations
- 2016Replacement of 5% of OPC by fly ash and APC residues from MSWI with electrodialytic pre-treatment
- 2015Comparison of 2-compartment, 3-compartment and stack designs for electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Screening of variable importance for optimizing electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Multivariate methods for evaluating the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2014Electrodialytically treated MSWI APC residue as substitute for cement in mortar
- 2013Effect of pulse current on acidification and removal of Cu, Cd, and As during suspended electrodialytic soil remediationcitations
- 2012Electrodialytic remediation of suspended soil – Comparison of two different soil fractionscitations
- 2007Electrodialytic extraction of Cd and Cu from sediment from Sisimiut Harbour, Greenlandcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparison of 2-compartment, 3-compartment and stack designs for electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from harbour sediments
Abstract
Comparisons of cell and stack designs for the electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from two harbour sediments, were made. Multivariate modelling showed that sediment properties and experimental set-ups had the highest influence on the heavy metal removal indicating that they should be modelled and analysed separately. Clean-up levels of Cu, Pb and Zn were significantly higher for the cell designs, implying that longer time and relatively more electric charge and energy would be necessary to achieve similar clean-up levels in the stack design experiments.In the studied experimental domain, the optimal current density for the 2- and 3-compartment cells was 0.12mA/cm<sup>2</sup> (center value) removing the highest quantity of Cu, Pb and Zn per Wh. The highest percentages removed were 82% Cu, 81% Pb and 92% Zn were however achieved at higher current density. For the stack experiments conducted at same electric charge per unit sediment, energy consumption was a magnitude higher and the highest clean-up levels were 21% Cu, 42% Pb and 73% Zn.