Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Fuenmayor, Evert

  • Google
  • 12
  • 23
  • 508

Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (12/12 displayed)

  • 2024Material compatibility and processing challenges in droplet deposition modelling additive manufacturing5citations
  • 2024Material compatibility and processing challenges in droplet deposition modelling additive manufacturing: A study on pharmaceutical excipients Polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate (PVP/VA) and Polycaprolactone (PCL)5citations
  • 2022Heat dissipation plays critical role for longevity of polymer-based 3D-printed inserts for plastics injection moulding.6citations
  • 2021Stereolithography (SLA) utilised to print injection mould tooling in order to evaluate thermal and mechanical properties of commercial polypropylene16citations
  • 2019Comparison of fused-filament fabrication to direct compression and injection molding in the manufacture of oral tablets58citations
  • 2019Influence of annealing and biaxial expansion on the properties of Poly-l-lactic) medical tubing.20citations
  • 2019Additive Manufacturing of Personalized Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms via Stereolithography85citations
  • 2019Additive manufacturing of PLA/HNT nanocomposites for biomedical applications19citations
  • 2019Influence of Annealing and Biaxial Expansion on the Properties of Poly(l-Lactic Acid) Medical Tubing20citations
  • 2019Influence of annealing and biaxial expansion on the properties of poly(l-lactic acid) medical tubing20citations
  • 2018Material considerations for fused-filament fabrication of solid dosage forms.127citations
  • 2018Material considerations for fused-filament fabrication of solid dosage forms127citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ebrahimi, Farnoosh
2 / 2 shared
Major, Ian
9 / 41 shared
Xu, Han
2 / 4 shared
Lyons, John G.
4 / 12 shared
Bezerra, Gilberto S. N.
1 / 1 shared
Hayes, Conor
2 / 2 shared
Hopkins, Michael Jnr.
1 / 1 shared
Devine, Declan M.
2 / 13 shared
Günbay, Suzan
1 / 1 shared
Moritz, Vicente
1 / 1 shared
Lyons, Sean
5 / 36 shared
Moritz, Vicente F.
1 / 5 shared
Gunbay, Suzan
1 / 1 shared
Jnr, Michael Hopkins
1 / 1 shared
Devine, Declan
4 / 34 shared
Mcconville, Christopher
3 / 11 shared
Forde, Martin
3 / 3 shared
Healy, Andrew
3 / 4 shared
Doran, Patrick
4 / 4 shared
Dillon, Brian
3 / 3 shared
Gately, Noel M.
2 / 6 shared
Healy, Andrew V.
3 / 5 shared
Venkatesh, Chaitra
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2021
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ebrahimi, Farnoosh
  • Major, Ian
  • Xu, Han
  • Lyons, John G.
  • Bezerra, Gilberto S. N.
  • Hayes, Conor
  • Hopkins, Michael Jnr.
  • Devine, Declan M.
  • Günbay, Suzan
  • Moritz, Vicente
  • Lyons, Sean
  • Moritz, Vicente F.
  • Gunbay, Suzan
  • Jnr, Michael Hopkins
  • Devine, Declan
  • Mcconville, Christopher
  • Forde, Martin
  • Healy, Andrew
  • Doran, Patrick
  • Dillon, Brian
  • Gately, Noel M.
  • Healy, Andrew V.
  • Venkatesh, Chaitra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Material compatibility and processing challenges in droplet deposition modelling additive manufacturing

  • Ebrahimi, Farnoosh
  • Major, Ian
  • Fuenmayor, Evert
  • Xu, Han
Abstract

<p>Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the production of complex, lightweight, and customized components with superior quality. Selecting the right materials considering their thermal properties, printability, and layer adhesion is crucial in melting-based AM techniques. This study investigates Droplet Deposition Modelling (DDM), an innovative material extrusion process that utilizes thermoplastic granules. DDM is distinguished by its shorter manufacturing times and a wider range of materials, setting it apart from traditional material extrusion methods such as fused filament fabrication. We investigated the printability and part quality in DDM using two common pharmaceutical excipients: Polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate 6:4 (PVP/VA), which is highly brittle, and Polycaprolactone (PCL), known for its low solubility and role in controlled drug release. Different ratios of PVP/VA and PCL were compounded via hot melt extrusion (HME) and used in DDM to study the impact of ingredient content on printability and part quality, employing geometrical models to assess material compatibility and printability. The study revealed that increasing PVP/VA content leads to higher viscosity, reduced flowability, and uneven deposition, with formulations of 80 % and 100 % PVP/VA showing poor processability. In contrast, formulations with 60 % and 40 % PVP/VA exhibited smooth processing and compatibility with DDM. We identified processing temperature and Drop Aspect Ratio (DAR) as key factors influencing material printability and part quality. Elevated processing temperatures and reduced DAR were found to increase interface temperatures, reduce diffusion, and potentially cause the 'elephant feet' issue. Additionally, smaller droplet sizes and material characteristics, such as higher interfacial tension in PCL, could lead to coalescence. Our findings highlight the complexities in optimizing DDM processing parameters and material blends, underscoring the need for careful formulation design to achieve high-quality 3D printed products.</p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • melt
  • viscosity
  • interfacial
  • thermoplastic
  • material extrusion
  • melt extrusion