Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Conway, Barbara

  • Google
  • 8
  • 26
  • 62

University of Huddersfield

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2021Magnesium Aluminium Silicate-Metformin Hydrochloride Complexes - The Use of Isothermal Calorimetry for Probing Clay and Drug Nanocomplexationscitations
  • 2020Thermodynamics of clay – Drug complex dispersions7citations
  • 2020A molecular understanding of magnesium aluminium silicate – drug, drug - polymer, magnesium aluminium silicate - polymer nanocomposite complex interactions in modulating drug release8citations
  • 2020Use of thermodynamics in understanding drug release from xanthan gum matrices4citations
  • 2020Imaging of the Effect of Alcohol-Containing Media on the Performance of Hypromellose Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets: Comparison of Direct Compression and Regular Grades of Polymer4citations
  • 2019Effect of preparation method on the surface properties and UV imaging of indomethacin solid dispersions19citations
  • 2019Real time calorimetric characterisation of clay–drug complex dispersions and particles5citations
  • 2017The influence of hydroalcoholic media on the performance of Grewia polysaccharide in sustained release tablets15citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Waters, Laura
5 / 5 shared
Asare-Addo, Kofi
8 / 13 shared
Totea, Ana-Maria
6 / 7 shared
Laity, Peter R.
1 / 2 shared
Dorin, Irina
4 / 4 shared
Laity, Peter
4 / 5 shared
Hemming, Karl
1 / 1 shared
Sabin, Juan
2 / 2 shared
Hussain, Tariq
1 / 3 shared
Ward, Adam
2 / 4 shared
Hanley, Sarah
1 / 1 shared
Walton, Karl
3 / 5 shared
Brown, Jonathan
1 / 1 shared
Timmins, Peter
2 / 3 shared
Kaialy, Waseem
1 / 6 shared
Mawla, Nihad
2 / 2 shared
Taheri, Sadaf
1 / 1 shared
Shafiee, Maen Al
1 / 1 shared
Adebisi, Dr Adeola O.
2 / 2 shared
Dorin, I.
1 / 2 shared
Gavrilov, G.
1 / 2 shared
Bills, Paul
1 / 14 shared
Dawson, C.
1 / 1 shared
Mahdi, Mohammed
1 / 1 shared
Nep, Elijah I.
1 / 1 shared
Smith, Alan
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Waters, Laura
  • Asare-Addo, Kofi
  • Totea, Ana-Maria
  • Laity, Peter R.
  • Dorin, Irina
  • Laity, Peter
  • Hemming, Karl
  • Sabin, Juan
  • Hussain, Tariq
  • Ward, Adam
  • Hanley, Sarah
  • Walton, Karl
  • Brown, Jonathan
  • Timmins, Peter
  • Kaialy, Waseem
  • Mawla, Nihad
  • Taheri, Sadaf
  • Shafiee, Maen Al
  • Adebisi, Dr Adeola O.
  • Dorin, I.
  • Gavrilov, G.
  • Bills, Paul
  • Dawson, C.
  • Mahdi, Mohammed
  • Nep, Elijah I.
  • Smith, Alan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of preparation method on the surface properties and UV imaging of indomethacin solid dispersions

  • Taheri, Sadaf
  • Ward, Adam
  • Conway, Barbara
  • Shafiee, Maen Al
  • Walton, Karl
  • Adebisi, Dr Adeola O.
  • Asare-Addo, Kofi
  • Totea, Ana-Maria
  • Timmins, Peter
  • Mawla, Nihad
Abstract

This work explores the use of UV imaging in solid dispersion systems. Solid dispersions are one of the common strategies used in improving the dissolution of poorly soluble drugs. Three manufacturing techniques (spray drying (SD), freeze drying (FD) and homogenising (HG)) are investigated. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) was used in characterising the solid dispersions. Advanced imaging was implemented to give an insight into how these solid dispersions performed. The DSC and XRPD results showed that all three methods and the various ratios studied produced amorphous solid dispersions. Ultra-Violet (UV) imaging of the pseudo Intrinsic Dissolution Rate (IDR) deduced only two samples to have superior pseudo IDR values to the IDR of the parent drug indomethacin (INDO). The whole dose imaging of the capsule formulation however showed all the samples (SD, FD and HG) to have superior dissolution to that of INDO which was in contrast to the IDR results. The UV images obtained from the determination of the pseudo IDR also showed a phenomenon the authors are reporting for the first time where increased polymer (Soluplus) content produced “web-like” strands that migrated to the top of the quartz cell which may have been responsible for the low pseudo IDR values. The authors also report for the first time using this UV imaging technique, the tip of a capsule coming off for drug to go into solution. The area under the curve suggested the best five samples dissolution wise to be 1:3 SD > 1:1 HG > 1:1 SD > 1:3 FD > 1:3 HG meaning a ratio of INDO to SOL in these dispersion of up to 1:3 being sufficient to produce significant dissolution increases. The developed interfacial (surface) area ratio (Sdr) highlighted how the surface area of the IDR compacts varied between the batches, in particular highlighting larger surface area gains for the FD and HG compacts. A choice of instrumentation/techniques to use in making solid dispersions may well come down to cost or instrument availability for a formulator as all three techniques were successful in improving the dissolution of indomethacin. This work thus highlights the importance of having both complimentary IDR and whole dosage imaging techniques in giving a better understanding of solid dispersion systems.

Topics
  • dispersion
  • surface
  • polymer
  • amorphous
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • drying