Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Os, Peter Van

  • Google
  • 1
  • 8
  • 27

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Understanding Solvent Degradation27citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Unterberger, Sven
1 / 2 shared
Zangrilli, Luigi
1 / 2 shared
Schallert, Bernd
1 / 2 shared
Irons, Robin
1 / 2 shared
Dhingra, Sanjana
1 / 2 shared
Goetheer, Earl
1 / 4 shared
Rieder, Alexander
1 / 2 shared
Khakharia, Purvil
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Unterberger, Sven
  • Zangrilli, Luigi
  • Schallert, Bernd
  • Irons, Robin
  • Dhingra, Sanjana
  • Goetheer, Earl
  • Rieder, Alexander
  • Khakharia, Purvil
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Understanding Solvent Degradation

  • Unterberger, Sven
  • Zangrilli, Luigi
  • Schallert, Bernd
  • Irons, Robin
  • Dhingra, Sanjana
  • Goetheer, Earl
  • Os, Peter Van
  • Rieder, Alexander
  • Khakharia, Purvil
Abstract

<p>Degradation of amines is one of the most important issues to be addressed for absorption-desorption based post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Several laboratory studies have been performed to identify the degradation products and understand the mechanisms of degradation. However, there seems to be a gap in knowledge from translating the lab scale studies to observations from the pilot campaigns. Moreover, the observations from different pilot plant campaigns can be quite different. The objective of this study is to compare the solvent degradation behavior from different campaigns and highlight their causes in terms of solvent metal content and ammonia emissions. Results from the following different pilot plants are evaluated: (a) TNO's CO<sub>2</sub> capture plant at Maasvlakte, the Netherlands, (b) EnBW's CO<sub>2</sub> capture plant at Heilbronn, Germany and (c) ENEL's CO<sub>2</sub> capture plant at Brindisi, Italy. The different rate of oxidative degradation are correlated to the different operating conditions and layout of the pilot plants. Along with these results, kinetic models based on laboratory studies are used to compare the pilot plant observations, highlighting the differences between lab-scale studies and pilot plant studies.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • combustion
  • amine