Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lefever, Gerlinde

  • Google
  • 13
  • 11
  • 207

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2023Monitoring the self-healing evolution of cementitious mixtures with superabsorbent polymers through air-coupled ultrasound1citations
  • 2023Crack closure assessment in cementitious mixtures based on ultrasound measurements1citations
  • 2023Ultrasonic evaluation of self-healing cementitious materials with superabsorbent polymers: Mortar vs. concrete19citations
  • 2023Ultrasonic evaluation of self-healing cementitious materials with superabsorbent polymers: Mortar vs. concrete19citations
  • 2022Nanomaterials in self-healing cementitious composites4citations
  • 2022Evaluation of self-healing in cementitious materials with superabsorbent polymers through ultrasonic mapping29citations
  • 2021Sensor Size Effect on Rayleigh Wave Velocity on Cementitious Surfaces6citations
  • 2020The influence of superabsorbent polymers and nanosilica on the hydration process and microstructure of cementitious mixtures27citations
  • 2020Superabsorbent polymers and nanosilica for mitigation of autogenous shrinkage and promotion of self-healing of cementitious materialscitations
  • 2020Chasing the Bubble: Ultrasonic Dispersion and Attenuation from Cement with Superabsorbent Polymers to Shampoo4citations
  • 2020Evaluation of the Self-Healing Ability of Mortar Mixtures Containing Superabsorbent Polymers and Nanosilica58citations
  • 2020The contribution of elastic wave NDT to the characterization of modern cementitious media38citations
  • 2018Assessment of the effect of nanosilica on the mechanical performance and durability of cementitious materials1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Snoeck, Didier
8 / 46 shared
Charkieh, Ahmad Shawki
3 / 3 shared
Van Hemelrijck, Danny
8 / 126 shared
Aggelis, Dimitrios G.
9 / 73 shared
Belie, Nele De
4 / 54 shared
Abbass, Mustafa
1 / 1 shared
Abbas, Mustafa
1 / 1 shared
Ospitia Patino, Nicolas
1 / 11 shared
Raes, Marc
1 / 2 shared
Hauffman, Tom
1 / 59 shared
Van Vlierberghe, Sandra
1 / 27 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Snoeck, Didier
  • Charkieh, Ahmad Shawki
  • Van Hemelrijck, Danny
  • Aggelis, Dimitrios G.
  • Belie, Nele De
  • Abbass, Mustafa
  • Abbas, Mustafa
  • Ospitia Patino, Nicolas
  • Raes, Marc
  • Hauffman, Tom
  • Van Vlierberghe, Sandra
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Ultrasonic evaluation of self-healing cementitious materials with superabsorbent polymers: Mortar vs. concrete

  • Snoeck, Didier
  • Charkieh, Ahmad Shawki
  • Lefever, Gerlinde
  • Van Hemelrijck, Danny
  • Aggelis, Dimitrios G.
  • Abbas, Mustafa
Abstract

The inclusion of superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) has become increasingly attractive to promote the self-healing<br/>ability of cementitious materials, thereby reducing the costs related to manual repairs. To advocate the use of<br/>these additives within large-scale constructions, an assessment of the self-healing ability is needed to ensure the<br/>safety of infrastructures. A non-destructive evaluation method was found in the adoption of ultrasonic moni-<br/>toring. Thanks to the sensitivity of ultrasound to the elastic properties, the technique allows to determine the self-<br/>healing effectiveness and to compare the healing capacity between different mixtures. However, most studies<br/>concerning ultrasonic assessments of the healing evolution were conducted on mortars, lacking large aggregates.<br/>Therefore, to upgrade to the most commonly used construction material, self-healing of concrete is monitored,<br/>and its performance is compared to mortar. Ultrasonic surface wave monitoring shows the potential to evaluate<br/>the crack closure in either mixture and the effect of different SAPs included.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • inclusion
  • crack
  • ultrasonic