Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Maweja, Kasonde

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 21

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016Contact damage and residual strength in polycrystalline diamond (PCD)21citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Llanes, Luis
1 / 17 shared
Mestra, A.
1 / 2 shared
García-Marro, F.
1 / 1 shared
Kanyanta, Valentine
1 / 4 shared
Ozbayraktar, S.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Llanes, Luis
  • Mestra, A.
  • García-Marro, F.
  • Kanyanta, Valentine
  • Ozbayraktar, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Contact damage and residual strength in polycrystalline diamond (PCD)

  • Llanes, Luis
  • Mestra, A.
  • García-Marro, F.
  • Maweja, Kasonde
  • Kanyanta, Valentine
  • Ozbayraktar, S.
Abstract

he tolerance to contact damage of polycrystalline diamond (PCD) composites is investigated. Three different PCD grades are considered. Contact damage is extrinsically introduced by spherical indentation techniques, an approach well-established to evaluate damage tolerance issues in other hard materials. Such damage is induced on the surface of polished specimens, under both monotonic and cyclic loading conditions, and is characterized by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Residual strength is used as discriminative parameter for evaluation of damage tolerance. Hence, non-indented (reference) and indented specimens are fractured by means of biaxial ball-on-three-ball flexure testing. Results show that tolerance to contact damage is dependent on the microstructural characteristics of each PCD grade. Hence, although fine PCD grade exhibits the highest reference strength, corresponding indented specimens show pronounced fracture resistance decay for relatively high applied loads or number of cycles. On the other hand, the bimodal and coarse PCD variants are found to be more tolerant to contact damage, i.e. fracture strength shows only slight changes as cracks are introduced. The trends discerned are discussed on the basis of relative discontinuous character and sharpness of the induced damage, as well as effective depth of corresponding cracks, all of them directly dependent on the PCD microstructure assemblage.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • composite