Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schneider, Luis Felipe J.

  • Google
  • 5
  • 6
  • 143

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2023Luting laminate veneers: do resin-composites produce less polymerization stress than resin cements?6citations
  • 2013The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites50citations
  • 2011Surface integrity of solvent-challenged ormocer-matrix composite27citations
  • 2011Degradation resistance of silorane, experimental ormocer and dimethacrylate resin-based dental composites.52citations
  • 2009Bond-disruptive stresses generated by resin composite polymerization in dental cavities8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cavalcante, Larissa Maria
4 / 6 shared
Silikas, Nikolaos
4 / 93 shared
Liberato, Walleska Feijó
1 / 1 shared
Watts, Dc.
4 / 116 shared
Salgado, Vinícius Esteves
1 / 1 shared
Marghalani, Hanadi Y.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2013
2011
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cavalcante, Larissa Maria
  • Silikas, Nikolaos
  • Liberato, Walleska Feijó
  • Watts, Dc.
  • Salgado, Vinícius Esteves
  • Marghalani, Hanadi Y.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Luting laminate veneers: do resin-composites produce less polymerization stress than resin cements?

  • Cavalcante, Larissa Maria
  • Silikas, Nikolaos
  • Liberato, Walleska Feijó
  • Watts, Dc.
  • Schneider, Luis Felipe J.
Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> Regular composites could produce less polymerization stress than resin cements when luting laminate veneers but there is no proper evidence to support this theory. The current study aimed to determine the degree of conversion, volumetric shrinkage, polymerization stress and the resultant elastic moduli of materials currently used for adhesive cementation and to determine possible correlations.<br/><br/><b>Methods: </b>The study considered (i) regular resin composites (Admira Fusion, Gradia, Grandioso, Palfique, Sirius Z, Viscalor and Z100) at room and pre-warmed (PW) at 69ºC, (ii) flowable composites (Sigma Flow and Grandioso Flow); (iii) solely light-activated cements (AllCem Veneer, Variolink Esthetic and RelyX Veneer); and (iv) one dual-activated resin cement (SpeedCEM). Degree of conversion (DC, n=3) was accessed with FTIR 1h after irradiation. Bonded-disk and Bioman II<br/>instruments were used to access polymerization shrinkage strain and shrinkage stress, respectively, for 60 min at 23 ± 1◦C (n=3). The elastic modulus was determined by 3-point bending flexural test (n=6). The results were submitted to analyses of variance, Tukey’s, and correlation tests. <br/><br/><b>Results:</b> For regular composites, the pre-warming did not affect DC, shrinkage and modulus but significantly increased the stress magnitude. Correlation tests indicated a significant relationship only between stress and polymerization shrinkage (<i>r</i>=0.811343). <br/><br/><b>Significance:</b> Regular composites can produce less polymerization stress than resin cements when luting laminate veneers. Polymerization stress was dependent on the shrinkage magnitude, but not on the degree of conversion nor the elastic modulus. <br/>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • theory
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • composite
  • cement
  • bending flexural test
  • resin