Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sunbul, Hanan Al

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 162

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016Polymerization shrinkage kinetics andshrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites162citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Silikas, Nikolaos
1 / 93 shared
Watts, Dc.
1 / 116 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Silikas, Nikolaos
  • Watts, Dc.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Polymerization shrinkage kinetics andshrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites

  • Sunbul, Hanan Al
  • Silikas, Nikolaos
  • Watts, Dc.
Abstract

Objectives. To investigate a set of resin-composites and the effect of their composition onpolymerization shrinkage strain and strain kinetics, shrinkage stress and the apparentelastic modulus.Methods. Eighteen commercially available resin-composites were investigated. Three spec-imens (n = 3) were made per material and light-cured with an LED unit (1200 mW/cm2) for20 s. The bonded-disk method was used to measure the shrinkage strain and Bioman shrink-age stress instrument was used to measure shrinkage stress. The shrinkage strain kineticsat 23◦C was monitored for 60 min. Maximum strain and stress was evaluated at 60 min. Theshrinkage strain rate was calculated using numerical differentiation.Results. The shrinkage strain values ranged from 1.83 (0.09) % for Tetric Evoceram (TEC) to4.68 (0.04) % for Beautifil flow plus (BFP). The shrinkage strain rate ranged from 0.11 (0.01%s−1)for Gaenial posterior (GA-P) to 0.59 (0.07) %s−1for BFP. Shrinkage stress values ranged from3.94 (0.40) MPa for TET to 10.45 (0.41) MPa for BFP. The apparent elastic modulus ranged from153.56 (18.7) MPa for Ever X posterior (EVX) to 277.34 (25.5) MPa for Grandio SO heavy flow(GSO).Significance. The nature of the monomer system determines the amount of the bulk contrac-tion that occurs during polymerization and the resultant stress. Higher values of shrinkagestrain and stress were demonstrated by the investigated flowable materials. The bulk-fillmaterials showed comparable result when compared to the traditional resin-composites.

Topics
  • composite
  • resin