People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Sunbul, Hanan Al
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Polymerization shrinkage kinetics andshrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites
Abstract
Objectives. To investigate a set of resin-composites and the effect of their composition onpolymerization shrinkage strain and strain kinetics, shrinkage stress and the apparentelastic modulus.Methods. Eighteen commercially available resin-composites were investigated. Three spec-imens (n = 3) were made per material and light-cured with an LED unit (1200 mW/cm2) for20 s. The bonded-disk method was used to measure the shrinkage strain and Bioman shrink-age stress instrument was used to measure shrinkage stress. The shrinkage strain kineticsat 23◦C was monitored for 60 min. Maximum strain and stress was evaluated at 60 min. Theshrinkage strain rate was calculated using numerical differentiation.Results. The shrinkage strain values ranged from 1.83 (0.09) % for Tetric Evoceram (TEC) to4.68 (0.04) % for Beautifil flow plus (BFP). The shrinkage strain rate ranged from 0.11 (0.01%s−1)for Gaenial posterior (GA-P) to 0.59 (0.07) %s−1for BFP. Shrinkage stress values ranged from3.94 (0.40) MPa for TET to 10.45 (0.41) MPa for BFP. The apparent elastic modulus ranged from153.56 (18.7) MPa for Ever X posterior (EVX) to 277.34 (25.5) MPa for Grandio SO heavy flow(GSO).Significance. The nature of the monomer system determines the amount of the bulk contrac-tion that occurs during polymerization and the resultant stress. Higher values of shrinkagestrain and stress were demonstrated by the investigated flowable materials. The bulk-fillmaterials showed comparable result when compared to the traditional resin-composites.