| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Goes, Mario Fernando De
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2017Postradiation Matrix Metalloproteinase-20 Expression and Its Impact on Dental Micromorphology and Radiation-Related Cariescitations
- 2017Short- and long-term bond strength between resin cement and glass-ceramic using a silane-containing universal adhesivecitations
- 2012Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentincitations
- 2010The effect of acid etchant type and dentin location on tubular density and dimensioncitations
- 2007Bond strength and monomer conversion of bonding agents mixed with restorative composites prior to light exposurecitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to investigate the microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) and failure pattern of self-adhesive luting cements (SLC) to dentin pre-treated with different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX) solutions. Methods: The occlusal enamel was removed from 30 extracted sound human molars in order to expose a flat dentin. Resin-composite (Filtek Z250, 3 M ESPE) discs (12 mm in diameter, 6.0 mm thickness) were cemented to the smear layer-covered dentin using the SLC [RelyX U100, 3 M ESPE (U100); Multilink Sprint, Ivoclar Vivadent (MS)] with 0.2% or 2.0% CHX solutions. Results were compared with the control, untreated dentin. Six groups were then created based on the SLC and dentin pre-treatment (n = 5). After 24 h of water storage, restored teeth were serially sectioned into beams with a cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm 2 at the bonded interface. Subsequently, specimens were tested in tension with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine, and the failure patterns were classified. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests were performed (α = 0.05). Additionally, 18 teeth were subjected to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis and micromorphology characterization of the smear layer-covered dentin and 0.2% or 2.0% CHX-treated dentin surfaces. Results: The μ-TBS obtained for both control groups were significantly higher, regardless of the CHX concentration and/or the cement used. Bond strengths were significantly higher for U100 than for MS, except when 2.0% CHX was applied. Fractographic analysis indicated that most failures in the control groups occurred cohesively in the SLC. Pre-treated dentin with 0.2% and 2.0% CHX solutions presented higher incidences of adhesive failures. EDS/SEM analysis exhibited varied concentrations of chlorine ions and crystal-shaped precipitates, depending upon the CHX concentration. Significance: Pre-treatment of dentin with 0.2% or 2.0% CHX adversely affects the bonding efficacy when associated with the SLCs tested. © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.