People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kaleem, Muhammad
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (4/4 displayed)
- 2012Creep of experimental short fiber-reinforced composite resincitations
- 2012Viscoelastic stability of resin-composites under static and dynamic loadingcitations
- 2011A method for assessing force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-compositescitations
- 2009Effect of filler particle size and morphology on force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-compositescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Viscoelastic stability of resin-composites under static and dynamic loading
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the viscoelastic behavior (creep) of dental resin-composites under both static and cyclic loading in compression. Methods: Ten cylindrical specimens (4 mm × 6 mm), divided into two subgroups (n = 5) were prepared from each of four commercial resin-composites, using a divisible stainless steel mold. They were thoroughly cured from all sides. Groups 1 and 2 were loaded statically and dynamically respectively after 1 d of fabrication and dry storage. Group 1 was loaded with a constant static load of 35 MPa and it was applied for 2 h followed by 2 h of strain recovery to obtain the static creep (%) and permanent set (%) respectively. To Group 2 a cyclic load between 1 MPa and 50 MPa was applied at a frequency of 0.25 Hz for 30 min to obtain the "dynamic" creep strain (%). Regression and correlation analysis (α = 0.05) was performed to examine possible correlations between static and "dynamic" creep. Results: For the resin-composite investigated, a good correlation was found between "dynamic" creep strain (%) and maximum static creep strain (%) (r = 0.92) and a strong correlation was also found between "dynamic" creep strain (%) and permanent set (%) (r = 0.97), Significance: Maximum static creep was significantly higher than "dynamic" creep. A direct numerical equivalence was not expected between static and "dynamic" creep values, as in the case of "dynamic" creep, loading was cyclic and was applied for a shorter overall period. Nevertheless a strong correlation was found between the static and dynamic creep measurement. © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. All rights reserved.