Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Shamass, Rabee

  • Google
  • 15
  • 12
  • 420

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (15/15 displayed)

  • 2023Mechanical and GWP Assessment of Concrete Using Blast Furnace Slag, Silica Fume and Recycled Aggregate24citations
  • 2022A Numerical Study of Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Reinforced Beam Subjected to Seismic Loadingcitations
  • 2022Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Core Sandwich Panelscitations
  • 2022Experimental investigation on the flexural behaviour of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams23citations
  • 2022Structural performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete members: A review79citations
  • 2021Application of Artificial Neural Networks for web-post shear resistance of cellular steel beams38citations
  • 2021Ultimate behaviour and serviceability analysis of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams30citations
  • 2021Impact of chopped basalt fibres on the mechanical proper- ties of concretecitations
  • 2020Bond behaviour of austenitic stainless steel reinforced concrete56citations
  • 2020Experimental investigation into the flexural behaviour of basalt FRP reinforced concrete members38citations
  • 2019Analysis of concrete beams reinforced with stainless steelcitations
  • 2019Flexural analysis and design of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams76citations
  • 2018Bending Moment Capacity of Stainless Steel-Concrete Composite Beamscitations
  • 2018Analysis of Stainless Steel-Concrete Composite Beams28citations
  • 2017Behaviour of Composite Beams Made Using High Strength Steel28citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Limbachiya, Vireen
5 / 6 shared
Kovacs, R.
1 / 1 shared
Rispoli, O.
1 / 1 shared
El-Desoqi, Mohammed
1 / 1 shared
Bloy, J.
1 / 1 shared
Perera, J.
1 / 2 shared
Cashell, Ka
9 / 23 shared
Rabi, M.
4 / 6 shared
Cashell, K. A.
1 / 1 shared
M., Rabe.
1 / 1 shared
Desnerck, P.
1 / 4 shared
Rabi, Musab
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Limbachiya, Vireen
  • Kovacs, R.
  • Rispoli, O.
  • El-Desoqi, Mohammed
  • Bloy, J.
  • Perera, J.
  • Cashell, Ka
  • Rabi, M.
  • Cashell, K. A.
  • M., Rabe.
  • Desnerck, P.
  • Rabi, Musab
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical and GWP Assessment of Concrete Using Blast Furnace Slag, Silica Fume and Recycled Aggregate

  • Limbachiya, Vireen
  • Kovacs, R.
  • Rispoli, O.
  • Shamass, Rabee
Abstract

Demolition waste and cement production is responsible for 36% of total waste produced on earth and 8% of the worlds CO2 emissions, respectively. Due to limited research on concrete mixes containing ternary cementitious mixes (Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag (GGBS) and Silica Fume (SF)) and demolition waste, the paper reviewed the mechanical properties of concrete, and structural performance of reinforced beams. Thereafter, life cycle analysis (LCA) was investigated to understand the true environmental impact, focusing on Global Warming Potential (GWP). Results show that recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) had no significant negative impact on the compressive strength, tensile strength, and modulus of rupture of concrete. The inclusion of GGBS and SF in mixes containing RCA eliminated any negative impact and for all mixes produced greater strengths in comparison to the control mix, due to the secondary reaction of Ca (OH)2 and pore refinement. The flexural behavior of the concrete beams with 0%, 25%, 50% and 100% RCA, 25% GGBS and 5% SF is similar. LCA results showed that replacing NA with 25%, 50% or 100% RCA has no significant impact on the GWP emissions. This is because of the similar emissions associated with manufacturing and processing of recycled and natural aggregates. However, replacing cement with 5% SF and 25% GGBS improves the GWP environmental response of concrete significantly. Additionally, natural aggregates have a higher GWP contribution than that of recycled concrete aggregates by almost 80% since the process of NA required quarry operation and transportation while the RCA are produced on site from an existing building waste.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • inclusion
  • strength
  • cement
  • flexural strength
  • tensile strength