Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brabandere, Laurena De

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Comparative analysis of three different types of self-healing concrete via permeability testing and a quasi-steady-state chloride migration test7citations
  • 2023Influencing factors to the capillary water uptake of (un)cracked cementitious materials1citations
  • 2022Capillary imbibition in cementitious materials : effect of salts and exposure condition6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lee, Jung Hwan
1 / 2 shared
Lee, Kwang-Myong
1 / 2 shared
Van Mullem, Tim
2 / 12 shared
Belie, Nele De
3 / 54 shared
Suh, Jung-Il
1 / 3 shared
Alderete, Natalia
2 / 22 shared
Baeyens, Dries
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lee, Jung Hwan
  • Lee, Kwang-Myong
  • Van Mullem, Tim
  • Belie, Nele De
  • Suh, Jung-Il
  • Alderete, Natalia
  • Baeyens, Dries
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative analysis of three different types of self-healing concrete via permeability testing and a quasi-steady-state chloride migration test

  • Lee, Jung Hwan
  • Brabandere, Laurena De
  • Lee, Kwang-Myong
  • Van Mullem, Tim
  • Belie, Nele De
  • Suh, Jung-Il
Abstract

Concrete is the most used construction material in the world and with the growing world population, the demand for housing and infrastructure keeps increasing. Due to its low tensile strength, concrete cracks easily and these cracks have a negative effect on the durability. Different studies have already been conducted on the development of self-healing concrete, which has the ability to heal its own cracks. Unfortunately, due to a lack of standardized test methods, the boundary conditions in these studies are often different, making it difficult to do an accurate comparison. In this research, three different healing agents are tested using the same test methods under the same boundary conditions: a powder of organic/inorganic composite material (WM), solidified calcium sulfoaluminate capsules (SMU) and bacterial pellets (KU). The healing efficiency of the agents is tested with (1) a low-head water flow test on prismatic specimens cracked in a three-point bending test with subsequent active crack width control, (2) a Korean water permeability test on cylindrical specimens cracked by a Brazilian splitting test, (3) a chloride diffusion test and (4) a quasi-steady-state chloride migration test. The results showed that WM performed superior with respect to the reference mix and the other healing agents in the two water permeability tests and the quasi-steady-state chloride migration. The performance of SMU and KU was depending on the healing condition. When fully saturated during healing, the KU specimens had a good behaviour and SMU performed poorly. For the cylindrical specimens, with the specimen partly immersed in water, SMU and KU had a similar performance which was better in comparison to the reference.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • composite
  • bending flexural test
  • permeability
  • tensile strength
  • Calcium
  • durability