People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ali, M. S. Mohamed
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (5/5 displayed)
- 2022Experimental investigation into the structural behaviour of ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete box-celled composite panelscitations
- 2021An investigation into the feasibility of normal and fibre-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete multi-cell and composite sandwich panelscitations
- 2021ECO-UHPC with High-Volume Class-F Fly Ashcitations
- 2021Development of ECO-UHPC with very-low-C3A cement and ground granulated blast-furnace slagcitations
- 2018Experiments and Finite Element Analysis of GFRP Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Rectangular Columns Subjected to Concentric and Eccentric Axial Loadingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Development of ECO-UHPC with very-low-C3A cement and ground granulated blast-furnace slag
Abstract
<p>Substituting cement by supplementary cementitious material (SCM) is the most-practiced approach of reducing CO<sub>2</sub> footprint of concrete. However, in case of UHPC, for which ultra-high performance in terms of both strength and durability is of utmost importance, high-volume reduction of cement is often difficult or highly challenging. In this study, the possibility of high-volume incorporation of ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) in UHPC with very-low-C<sub>3</sub>A Portland cement (having 1.1% tricalcium aluminate or C<sub>3</sub>A) as primary binder has been explored. Benefits of using very-low-C<sub>3</sub>A cement as primary binder in UHPC, over cement with a moderate C<sub>3</sub>A content (9.3%), in terms of strength and workability have also been investigated. Results of the UHPC mixes incorporating GGBS suggest that 60% replacement of very-low-C<sub>3</sub>A cement by GGBS reduces the 28-day compressive strength of UHPC by 16.1% with respect to the strength of UHPC without GGBS. Nevertheless, ultra-high strength (>150 MPa) can still be achieved up to 60% replacement of cement by GGBS, without the need for any special curing or fibres. The water absorption and initial rate of absorption of UHPC, and the corrosion risk of rebar embedded in UHPC reduce with the increase of very-low-C<sub>3</sub>A cement replacement by GGBS. Up to 60% replacement of cement by GGBS, UHPC exhibits carbonation resistance similar to that of the UHPC without GGBS.</p>