Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Shariati, M.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 7
  • 153

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2020Enabling intelligent Mg-sheet processing utilizing efficient machine-learning algorithm17citations
  • 2016Comparative performance of channel and angle shear connectors in high strength concrete composites: An experimental study136citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Letzig, D.
1 / 141 shared
Kurz, G.
1 / 23 shared
Weber, W.
1 / 23 shared
Bohlen, J.
1 / 139 shared
Höche, D.
1 / 26 shared
Shariati, A.
1 / 1 shared
Kueh, A. B. H.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Letzig, D.
  • Kurz, G.
  • Weber, W.
  • Bohlen, J.
  • Höche, D.
  • Shariati, A.
  • Kueh, A. B. H.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative performance of channel and angle shear connectors in high strength concrete composites: An experimental study

  • Shariati, A.
  • Kueh, A. B. H.
  • Shariati, M.
Abstract

<p>Structural performance of steel-concrete composite structures relies deeply on the characteristics of the shear connectors. Recently, great attention has been focused on the implementation of C-shaped connectors due to numerous advantages when used in composite beams. However, very little information is available in regard to the response of such connectors when embedded in the high strength concrete (HSC). To address this research gap, sixteen experiments on push-out specimens were conducted to compare the performance of channel and angle shear connectors embedded in HSC. The shear resistance and ductility of the connectors were primarily investigated by applying static and cyclic loadings. Results were also compared with the cases when using normal reinforced concrete. Furthermore, the evaluation of the available equations suggested by the American and Canadian codes for estimating these connectors' capacities when using HSC was carried out. In general, channel connectors exhibited 6.8-30.1% more shear strength than those of angle under monotonic loading, and up to 18.5% more when subjected to cyclic loading. Angle connectors were also less ductile than channel connectors and did not satisfy the ductility criteria specified in the codes' requirements. Connector fracture mode of failure was recorded for both connector types.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • composite
  • ductility