Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Castro Gornes, Jp

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 157

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2008Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment157citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Pacheco Torgal, F.
1 / 6 shared
Jalali, S.
1 / 25 shared
Chart of publication period
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Pacheco Torgal, F.
  • Jalali, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment

  • Castro Gornes, Jp
  • Pacheco Torgal, F.
  • Jalali, S.
Abstract

Tungsten mine waste mud (TMWM) was investigated for its potential use as repair material of ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete. Bond strength between OPC concrete substrate and three repair materials was analysed. TMWM geopolymeric binder and two commercial repair products were used as repair materials. Bond strength behaviour was assessed from slant shear tests. A total of 128 slant shear specimens were made in order to evaluate bond strength at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days curing. Four kinds of concrete substrate surface treatment were used, as cast against metallic formwork, as cast against wood formwork, saw cut and acid etching. This study indicates that TMWM geopolymeric binders possess very high bond strength even at early ages and that behaviour is not affected by low surface treatment roughness. Commercial repair products on the other hand show very low bond strength and are very dependent on surface treatment roughness. Scanning electron micrographs reveal that TMWM geopolymeric binders chemically bond to the concrete substrate, while cost comparisons show this geopolymeric repair solution is by far the most cost efficient.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • shear test
  • cement
  • etching
  • wood
  • tungsten
  • curing