Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Meißner, Robert

  • Google
  • 8
  • 28
  • 117

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2023Searching the chemical space for effective magnesium dissolution modulators: a deep learning approach using sparse featurescitations
  • 2022Adsorption of oleic acid on magnetite facetscitations
  • 2021Weak adhesion detection – enhancing the analysis of vibroacoustic modulation by machine learning18citations
  • 2021Predicting the inhibition efficiencies of magnesium dissolution modulators using sparse machine learning modelscitations
  • 2020A first-principles analysis of the charge transfer in magnesium corrosion58citations
  • 2020ATR-FTIR in Kretschmann configuration integrated with electrochemical cell as in situ interfacial sensitive tool to study corrosion inhibitors for magnesium substratescitations
  • 2019Data science based mg corrosion engineering41citations
  • 2019Data science based mg corrosion engineeringcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lamaka, Sviatlana
4 / 8 shared
Feiler, Christian
5 / 8 shared
Cyron, Christian Johannes
2 / 2 shared
Aydin, Roland
2 / 3 shared
Schiessler, Elisabeth J.
2 / 2 shared
Vaghefinazari, Bahram
1 / 5 shared
Zheludkevich, Mikhail
5 / 18 shared
Würger, Tim
6 / 10 shared
Noei, Heshmat
1 / 20 shared
Arndt, Björn
1 / 1 shared
Stierle, Andreas
1 / 28 shared
Tober, Steffen
1 / 4 shared
Konuk, Mine
1 / 2 shared
Creutzburg, Marcus
1 / 7 shared
Boll, Benjamin
1 / 1 shared
Willmann, Erik
1 / 1 shared
Fiedler, Bodo
1 / 39 shared
Vonbun-Feldbauer, Gregor
2 / 4 shared
Boelen, B.
1 / 5 shared
Terryn, Herman
1 / 124 shared
Unbehau, Reneé
1 / 1 shared
Fockaert, Laura Lynn
1 / 1 shared
Mol, J. M. C.
1 / 93 shared
Feldbauer, Gregor
1 / 1 shared
Zheludkevich, Mikhail L.
1 / 24 shared
Höche, Daniel
2 / 16 shared
Lamaka, Sviatlana V.
1 / 3 shared
Musil, Félix
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lamaka, Sviatlana
  • Feiler, Christian
  • Cyron, Christian Johannes
  • Aydin, Roland
  • Schiessler, Elisabeth J.
  • Vaghefinazari, Bahram
  • Zheludkevich, Mikhail
  • Würger, Tim
  • Noei, Heshmat
  • Arndt, Björn
  • Stierle, Andreas
  • Tober, Steffen
  • Konuk, Mine
  • Creutzburg, Marcus
  • Boll, Benjamin
  • Willmann, Erik
  • Fiedler, Bodo
  • Vonbun-Feldbauer, Gregor
  • Boelen, B.
  • Terryn, Herman
  • Unbehau, Reneé
  • Fockaert, Laura Lynn
  • Mol, J. M. C.
  • Feldbauer, Gregor
  • Zheludkevich, Mikhail L.
  • Höche, Daniel
  • Lamaka, Sviatlana V.
  • Musil, Félix
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Weak adhesion detection – enhancing the analysis of vibroacoustic modulation by machine learning

  • Boll, Benjamin
  • Willmann, Erik
  • Fiedler, Bodo
  • Meißner, Robert
Abstract

Adhesive bonding is a well-established technique for composite materials. Despite advanced surface treatments and preparations, surface contamination and application errors still occur, resulting in localised areas with a reduced adhesion. The dramatic reduction of the bond strength limits the applicability of adhesive bonds and hampers further industrial adaptation. This study aims to detect weak-bonds due to manufacturing errors or contamination by analysing and interpreting the vibroacoustic modulation signals with the aid of machine learning. An ultrasonic signal is introduced into the specimen by a piezoceramic actuator and modulated through a low frequency vibration excited by a servo-hydraulic testing system. Tested samples are single-lap shear specimens, according to ASTM D5868-01, with artificial circular debonding areas introduced as PTFE-films or a release agent contamination. It is shown that an artificial neural network can identify various defects in the bonded joint robustly and is able to predict residual strengths and hence demonstrates great potential for non-destructive testing of adhesive joints.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • defect
  • ultrasonic
  • machine learning