Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nayak, Amar Nath

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 28

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Effect of transverse and longitudinal reinforcement ratios on the behaviour of RC T-beams shear-strengthened with embedded FRP bars28citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Faramarzi, Asaad
1 / 5 shared
Sogut, Kagan
1 / 3 shared
Dirar, Samir
1 / 15 shared
Theofanous, Marios
1 / 24 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Faramarzi, Asaad
  • Sogut, Kagan
  • Dirar, Samir
  • Theofanous, Marios
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of transverse and longitudinal reinforcement ratios on the behaviour of RC T-beams shear-strengthened with embedded FRP bars

  • Faramarzi, Asaad
  • Nayak, Amar Nath
  • Sogut, Kagan
  • Dirar, Samir
  • Theofanous, Marios
Abstract

Seven reinforced concrete (RC) T-beams, comprising two unstrengthened (control) beams and five beams strengthened in shear with embedded FRP bars, were tested to failure. The test parameters were steel-to-FRP shear reinforcement ratio and tension reinforcement ratio. A nonlinear finite element (FE) model was developed, validated and used to conduct parametric studies. The experimental and FE results showed that the concrete and FRP contributions to shear resistance as well as the total shear force capacity all decrease with increasing steel-to-FRP shear reinforcement ratio. The tension reinforcement ratio influenced the failure mode of the tested and modelled beams but had insignificant impact on shear strength enhancement. The experimental results were compared with the FE and Concrete Society Technical Report 55 predictions. The FE model correctly reproduced the experimental results and gave accurate predictions, with a mean predicted-to-experimental ratio of 1.04, whereas TR55 gave conservative predictions, with a mean predicted-to-experimental ratio of 0.42.

Topics
  • strength
  • steel