People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Zadpoor, Amir, A.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (38/38 displayed)
- 2024Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printingcitations
- 2024On-Demand Magnetically-Activated Drug Delivery from Additively Manufactured Porous Bone Implants to Tackle Antibiotic-Resistant Infectionscitations
- 2024Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of extrusion-based additively manufactured porous iron–manganese scaffoldscitations
- 2024Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratiocitations
- 20244D Printing for Biomedical Applicationscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterialscitations
- 2023Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutescitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Mechanisms of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn alloy scaffoldscitations
- 2022Merging strut-based and minimal surface meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Nonlinear coarse-graining models for 3D printed multi-material biomimetic compositescitations
- 2022Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regenerationcitations
- 2022Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coating of additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffoldscitations
- 20214D printing of reconfigurable metamaterials and devices
- 2021Dynamic characterization of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials with tunable elastic propertiescitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printed biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
- 2021Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopycitations
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinccitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2020Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printingcitations
- 2019Auxeticity and stiffness of random networkscitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts through laser metal deposition (LMD)citations
- 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of metals using powder bed-based technologies
- 2019Fracture Behavior of Bio-Inspired Functionally Graded Soft–Hard Composites Made by Multi-Material 3D Printingcitations
- 2019A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymerscitations
- 2019Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesiumcitations
- 2018Multi-material 3D printed mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2017Rational design of soft mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesiumcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printing
Abstract
<p>Functional gradients are material transitions that are found in nature and are known to result in materials with superior properties and multiple functionalities. The emerging multi-material 3D printing (=additive manufacturing, AM) techniques provide a powerful tool for the design and fabrication of bioinspired functionally graded materials (FGMs). In particular, the spatial distribution of materials can be controlled at the level of individual volumetric pixels (voxels i.e., cubes with side lengths of 20–40 μm), thereby ensuring accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the obtained properties and allowing for systematic studies of how various design variables affect the deformation and fracture behaviors of FGMs. Here, we designed, 3D printed, and mechanically tested tensile and notched FGMs specimens with step-wise (i.e., 5-, 10-, and 15-steps) and continuous (sigmoid and linear) gradients. The deformation and fracture mechanisms of these FGM composites were studied using digital image correlation, digital microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. We further characterized the chemical composition and local mechanical properties of FGM composites using XPS and nanoindentation measurements, respectively. Tensile test specimens with a continuous gradient (i.e., linear) exhibited much higher Young's moduli (≈3-folds) and ultimate strengths (≈2-folds) but lower elongations (≈2-folds drop) as compared to those with stepwise gradients (i.e., 5-steps). Similarly, notched specimens with linear gradients exhibited 2-folds higher values of the stiffness and fracture stress, but 1.5-folds lower fracture strains as compared to those with 5-steps gradients. Although we found non-uniform highly concentrated strain distributions in all specimens, FGMs with linear gradients showed a smoother strain distribution and smaller crack blunting zones as compared to those with stepwise gradients. Our results imply that for stiffness and strength linear-gradient perform better than abrupt hard-soft-hard specimens.</p>