Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bisagni, Chiara

  • Google
  • 13
  • 24
  • 115

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2024Resistance-welded thermoset composites2citations
  • 2024Characterization and analysis of conduction welded thermoplastic composite joints considering the influence of manufacturing2citations
  • 2023The importance of accounting for large deformation in continuum damage models in predicting matrix failure of composites16citations
  • 2023Skin-stringer separation in post-buckling of butt-joint stiffened thermoplastic composite panels24citations
  • 2022Experimental and numerical evaluation of conduction welded thermoplastic composite joints31citations
  • 2022Damage arrest mechanisms in nanoparticle interleaved composite interfacescitations
  • 2022Characterization and analysis of the interlaminar behavior of thermoplastic composites considering fiber bridging and R-curve effects27citations
  • 2022FRACTURE TOUGHNESS AND PERFORMANCE OF RESISTANCE-WELDED AND CO-BONDED THERMOSET/THERMOPLASTIC POLYMER COMPOSITE HYBRID JOINTScitations
  • 2021Multiscale damage in co-cured composites - Perspectives from experiments and modellingcitations
  • 2020Development of a Numerical Framework for Virtual Testing to Support Design of a Next Generation Thermoplastic Multifunctional Fuselage7citations
  • 2019Geometrically nonlinear finite element model for predicting failure in composite structures6citations
  • 2019Analysis and testing of a thermoplastic composite stiffened panel under compressioncitations
  • 2018Virtual testing of thermoplastic compositescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Maierhofer, Thomas
2 / 4 shared
Butler, Richard
2 / 40 shared
Loukaides, Evripides G.
2 / 9 shared
Carr, Craig
2 / 2 shared
Tijs, Bas
8 / 12 shared
Turon, A.
5 / 45 shared
Dávila, C. G.
1 / 16 shared
Dooren, K. S. Van
2 / 2 shared
Waleson, J. E. A.
2 / 3 shared
Doldersum, M. H. J.
1 / 1 shared
Subramanian, Nithya
2 / 3 shared
Renart, J.
1 / 8 shared
Abdel-Monsef, S.
1 / 3 shared
Thibault, Hernandez
1 / 1 shared
Weaver, Pm
1 / 560 shared
Rebulla, Sergio Minera
1 / 11 shared
Patni, Mayank
1 / 14 shared
Pirrera, Alberto
1 / 85 shared
Labans, Edgars
1 / 2 shared
Waleson, J.
2 / 3 shared
Dooren, Kevin Van
1 / 1 shared
Veldman, S. L.
1 / 1 shared
Lopes, Cs
1 / 13 shared
Ingen, J. W. Van
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Maierhofer, Thomas
  • Butler, Richard
  • Loukaides, Evripides G.
  • Carr, Craig
  • Tijs, Bas
  • Turon, A.
  • Dávila, C. G.
  • Dooren, K. S. Van
  • Waleson, J. E. A.
  • Doldersum, M. H. J.
  • Subramanian, Nithya
  • Renart, J.
  • Abdel-Monsef, S.
  • Thibault, Hernandez
  • Weaver, Pm
  • Rebulla, Sergio Minera
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Pirrera, Alberto
  • Labans, Edgars
  • Waleson, J.
  • Dooren, Kevin Van
  • Veldman, S. L.
  • Lopes, Cs
  • Ingen, J. W. Van
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Geometrically nonlinear finite element model for predicting failure in composite structures

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Rebulla, Sergio Minera
  • Bisagni, Chiara
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Pirrera, Alberto
Abstract

Composite structures are extensively used in many industries, where they are subjected to a variety of loads and may undergo large deformations. Reliable utilisation of such structures requires prior knowledge of their failure response. In order to predict failure loads and modes, accurate, yet computationally efficient, evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) stress fields becomes important. In this paper, we present a modelling approach, based on the Unified Formulation, that accounts for geometric nonlinearity in laminated composites and predicts 3D stress fields for subsequent failure analysis. The approach builds upon the hierarchical Serendipity Lagrange finite elements and is able to capture high-order shear deformation, as well as local cross-sectional warping. A total Lagrangian approach is adopted and the classic Newton-Raphson method is employed to solve the nonlinear governing equations. A key novelty of the proposed formulation is its completeness and its applicability to fully anisotropic structures. In other words, using the Green-Lagrange strain components within the Unified Formulation framework, the explicit form of the tangent stiffness matrix is derived including general stiffness properties. This new model is benchmarked against 3D finite element solution, as well as other formulations available in the literature, by means of static analyses of highly nonlinear, laminated composite beam-like structures. Significant computational efficiency gains over 3D finite elements are observed for similar levels of accuracy. Furthermore, to show the enhanced capabilities of the present formulation, the postbuckling response of a composite stiffened panel is compared with experimental results from the literature. The 3D stress fields computed in the postbuckling regime are used to detect failure of the stiffened panel. The corresponding failure mode, as obtained by the new model, is shown to match with the experiment.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • anisotropic
  • composite