Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Moussawi, Ali

  • Google
  • 4
  • 10
  • 201

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2015Response of fiber Bragg gratings bonded on a glass/epoxy laminate subjected to static loadings30citations
  • 2015Response of fiber Bragg gratings bonded on a glass/epoxy laminate subjected to static loadings30citations
  • 2015Semi-metallic, strong and stretchable wet-spun conjugated polymer microfibers141citations
  • 2014Constitutive compatibility based identification of spatiallyvarying elastic parameters distributionscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Falandry, Didier
2 / 3 shared
Durand, Samuel
2 / 2 shared
Olivier, Philippe
2 / 41 shared
Mulle, Matthieu
2 / 7 shared
Lubineau, Gilles
1 / 11 shared
Anjum, Dalaver H.
1 / 25 shared
Xu, Xuezhu
1 / 2 shared
Aguilar, Isaac
1 / 6 shared
Smilgies, Detlef-M.
1 / 3 shared
Li, Ruipeng
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Falandry, Didier
  • Durand, Samuel
  • Olivier, Philippe
  • Mulle, Matthieu
  • Lubineau, Gilles
  • Anjum, Dalaver H.
  • Xu, Xuezhu
  • Aguilar, Isaac
  • Smilgies, Detlef-M.
  • Li, Ruipeng
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Response of fiber Bragg gratings bonded on a glass/epoxy laminate subjected to static loadings

  • Falandry, Didier
  • Durand, Samuel
  • Olivier, Philippe
  • Mulle, Matthieu
  • Moussawi, Ali
Abstract

Fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) may be used to monitor strain over the surface of a structure as an alternative technology to conventional strain gauges. However, FBG bonding techniques have still not been established to yield satisfactory surface measurements. Here, two adhesives were investigated, one with low viscosity and the other with high viscosity for bonding FBGs on glass/epoxy sandwich skins. First, instrumented elementary specimens were tested under tension. FBG strain results were analyzed together with digital image correlation (DIC) measurements. The influence of the bonding layer on the measured strain and on the integrity of the sensor was investigated by considering different regions of interest. Next, an instrumented structural sandwich beam was tested under four-point bending. FBG rosettes were compared to conventional strain gauge rosettes. The high viscosity adhesive demonstrated behaviors that affected FBG accuracy. Brittleness of the bonding layer and poor interface adhesion were observed using DIC and X-ray tomography. By contrast, the low viscosity adhesive demonstrated satisfactory results. The FBG strain measurements appeared to be consistent with those of DIC. The accuracy is also adequate as the FBGs and the conventional strain gauges had similar results in three directions, under tension and under compression.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • tomography
  • glass
  • glass
  • viscosity
  • surface measurement