Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Tong, Mb

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023A design methodology of composite scarf repairs using artificial intelligence11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Furtado, Carolina
1 / 24 shared
Camanho, Pp
1 / 229 shared
Danzi, F.
1 / 7 shared
Arteiro, A.
1 / 54 shared
Yan, B.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Furtado, Carolina
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Danzi, F.
  • Arteiro, A.
  • Yan, B.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A design methodology of composite scarf repairs using artificial intelligence

  • Tong, Mb
  • Furtado, Carolina
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Danzi, F.
  • Arteiro, A.
  • Yan, B.
Abstract

Composite Scarf Bonded (CSB) based techniques are highly effective in structural connections and structural repairs. In this article, a preliminary design methodology based on Machine Learning (ML) algorithms trained on databases obtained via a semi-analytical approach is proposed and used to generate the design space for CSB structures under tensile loads. This ML framework introduces the one-hot encoding technology to deal with discrete inputs, such as multiple stacking sequences. Four ML algorithms, Adaptive Boosting, Gradient Boosting Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks are studied. The best-performing model is then used to generate the damage tolerance-based design space for CSB structures made from fabric and unidirectional prepregs, accounting for material and geometrical uncertainties. Very good representations of the design space and accuracy in structural strength and failure mode are obtained. An optimal scarf angle zone, where laminate and adhesive fail simultaneously, was identified using the proposed framework. This design framework opens new avenues for the selection of material and layup configuration in structural design and enables the fast estimation of the optimal scarf angle range for the preliminary design of CSB structures.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • composite
  • machine learning