People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Wijskamp, S.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2025Critical evaluation of torsion rheometry to characterize the anisotropic intraply shear resistance of unidirectional thermoplastic composites in meltcitations
- 2024A state-rate model for the transient wall slip effects in ply-ply friction of UD C/PAEK tapes in melt
- 2024Prediction of the in-plane permeability and air evacuation time of fiber-placed thermoplastic composite preforms with engineered intertape channelscitations
- 2023Modeling the effect of temperature and pressure on the peak and steady-state ply-ply friction response for UD C/PAEK tapescitations
- 2023Corrigendum to “Prediction of the peak and steady-state ply–ply friction response for UD C/PAEK tapes” [Compos. Part A
- 2022Characterization of the water–titanium interaction and its effect on the adhesion of titanium-C/PEKK jointscitations
- 2022Formability Experiments for Unidirectional Thermoplastic Compositescitations
- 2022In-Plane Shear Characterization of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Tape Using the Bias Extension Methodcitations
- 2022The relation between in-plane fiber waviness severity and first ply failure in thermoplastic composite laminatescitations
- 2022The role of process induced polymer morphology on the fracture toughness of titanium-PEKK interfacescitations
- 2022Prediction of the peak and steady-state ply-ply friction response for UD C/PAEK tapescitations
- 2018Rapid Manufacturing of a Tailored Spar by AFP and Stamp Forming
- 2017Fibre length distribution of shredded thermoplastic composite scrap
- 2010Weld strength assessment for tape placementcitations
- 2006An integral process model for high precision composite forming
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Prediction of the peak and steady-state ply-ply friction response for UD C/PAEK tapes
Abstract
<p>Excessive ply–ply friction can lead to process-induced defects during the hot press forming of thermoplastic composite laminates. Process simulations can be used to enable first-time-right defect-free manufacturing. However, a good understanding of the ply–ply friction is required to improve the constitutive models to allow simulation of more complex parts. We performed friction experiments on UD C/PAEK tapes, showing a typical response with a peak followed by a steady-state friction. Micrographs of tested specimens were analyzed to evaluate the matrix interlayer thickness distribution in the ply–ply interface, which we combined with the matrix viscosity to predict the peak friction. Generated fiber distributions, mimicking the ply–ply interface, were successfully used to obtain the matrix interlayer as well. The steady-state friction was accurately described by including a critical shear stress to represent wall slip, substantiating the concept of wall slip as the dominant underlying mechanism for the start-up friction response.</p>