People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Hank, Travis J.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Static and fatigue interlaminar shear reinforcement in aligned carbon nanotube-reinforced hierarchical advanced composites
Abstract
High densities (>10 billion fibers per cm(2)) of aligned carbon nanotubes (A-CNTs) are used to reinforce the interlaminar resin-rich region of aerospace-grade unidirectional carbon microfiber plies in a hierarchical carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminate architecture. Such nano-engineered interfaces have been shown to increase interlaminar fracture toughness and substructural in-plane strengths, and here we show a 115% average increase in fatigue life across all load levels (60-90% of static strength), with a larger increase of 249% in high-cycle (at 60% of static strength) fatigue, despite no statistically significant increase in static strength. These findings are in agreement with a numerical damage progression model developed to simulate both interlaminar and intralaminar damage in the laminates, which shows the relative insensitivity of short-beam shear (SBS) strength to the enhancement of interlaminar fracture toughness, e.g., a 50% increase in interlaminar toughness yields an SBS strength increase of less than 20%. Consistent with observations of other CNT-reinforced epoxy architectures, larger improvements in fatigue life are noted in low-stress regimes (e.g., high-cycle fatigue) vs. in high-stress regimes (e.g., static and low-cycle fatigue), indicating a transition in dominant mechanisms from high-energy dissipation caused by CNT pullout to low-energy dissipation caused by CNT fracture as stress increases.