Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bonner, Mj

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 25

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2017The influence of the hybridisation configuration on the mechancial properties of hybrid self reinforced polyamide 12/carbon fibre composites25citations
  • 2008The incorporation of carbon nanofibres to enhance the properties of hot compacted self-reinforced single polymer compositescitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Swolfs, Yentl
1 / 220 shared
Verpoest, I.
1 / 52 shared
Hine, Pj
2 / 6 shared
Ward, Im
2 / 5 shared
Foster, Rj
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Swolfs, Yentl
  • Verpoest, I.
  • Hine, Pj
  • Ward, Im
  • Foster, Rj
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The influence of the hybridisation configuration on the mechancial properties of hybrid self reinforced polyamide 12/carbon fibre composites

  • Swolfs, Yentl
  • Verpoest, I.
  • Hine, Pj
  • Ward, Im
  • Bonner, Mj
Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts the properties of self-reinforced polyamide 12/carbon fibre hybrid composites made by three different hybridisation routes, termed intra-yarn, intra-layer and inter-layer. The starting point for each route was to manufacture layers of woven cloth (containing both components), from which the hybrid composites were manufactured using the Leeds hot compaction technique. In all cases, a carbon fibre volume fraction of around 8% was the target. On balance, the intra-layer hybrids had the best combination of properties, although all three hybridisation routes yielded interesting results. This intra-layer hybrid configuration showed a significant increase in tensile modulus and strength, bending modulus and strength and penetration impact energy compared to a pure self-reinforced polyamide sheet. The only negative aspect was a reduction in the tensile failure strain from 11 to 2%, whereas the ductility in bending was unaffected by the incorporation of the carbon fibres.

Topics
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • composite
  • ductility
  • woven
  • low energy electron diffraction