Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Béland, Laurent Karim

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Interatomic force fields for zirconium based on the embedded atom method and the tabulated Gaussian Approximation Potentialcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Byggmästar, Jesper
1 / 16 shared
Luo, Yu
1 / 1 shared
Daymond, Mark R.
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Byggmästar, Jesper
  • Luo, Yu
  • Daymond, Mark R.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Interatomic force fields for zirconium based on the embedded atom method and the tabulated Gaussian Approximation Potential

  • Byggmästar, Jesper
  • Luo, Yu
  • Béland, Laurent Karim
  • Daymond, Mark R.
Abstract

The accuracy of interatomic interaction potentials - also known as force fields - is the main factor determining the physical soundness of classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we present a multi-objective framework to generate embedded-atom-method (EAM) force fields using ab initio data. The EAM force fields were tuned via particle swarm optimization to capture the non-linear association between atomic structures and system energies. Using this framework, 95 standard EAM force fields for zirconium were developed and 45 physical features for each developed force field were tracked. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to provide insights into the compromises that must be made when generating EAM force fields. Of note, by assigning large fitting weights to generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE) surfaces, there exist EAM force fields with properly positioned minima on prismatic GSFE surfaces and containing no spurious minima in basal GSFE surfaces. However, while standard EAM force fields achieved this without explicitly taking the angular dependence of atomic interactions into account, they led to a severe mismatch between other important physical properties and benchmarks. Hence, we also constructed two machine-learned tabulated Gaussian approximation potentials (tabGAP) with an additional three-body term, which successfully tackled the aforementioned issue and exhibit acceptable prediction accuracy across many physical properties (lattice parameters, elastic properties, dimer potential energies, melting temperatures, phase stability, point defect formation energies, point defect migration energies, and free surface energies) of Zr. Remarkably, its computational efficiency is only 6 times slower than standard EAM force fields.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • phase
  • simulation
  • molecular dynamics
  • zirconium
  • melting temperature
  • stacking fault
  • point defect
  • phase stability