People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Quagliotti, Danilo
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2024Surface roughness of the parts produced by Tomographic Volumetric Printing (TVP) process
- 2019Modelling the filling behavior of micro structured plastic optical components
- 2018Multiscale dimensional tolerance specifications established on shrinkage assessment in ceramic micro injection moldingcitations
- 2018Manufacturing Signatures of Injection Molding and Injection Compression Molding for Micro-Structured Polymer Fresnel Lens Productioncitations
- 2018Evaluation of injection pressure as a process fingerprint for Injection and Injection Compression Molding of micro structured optical components
- 2017Replication assessment of surface texture at sub-micrometre scale
- 2017Multi Scale Micro and Nano Metrology for Advanced Precision Moulding Technologies
- 2016An international comparison of surface texture parameters quantification on polymer artefacts using optical instrumentscitations
- 2016Metrology of sub-micron structured polymer surfaces
- 2016Performance verification of focus variation and confocal microscopes measuring tilted ultra-fine surfaces
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
An international comparison of surface texture parameters quantification on polymer artefacts using optical instruments
Abstract
An international comparison of optical instruments measuring polymer surfaces with arithmetic mean height values in the sub-micrometre range has been carried out. The comparison involved sixteen optical surface texture instruments (focus variation instruments, confocal microscopes and coherent scanning interferometers) from thirteen research laboratories worldwide. Results demonstrated that: (i)Agreement among different instruments could be achieved to a limited extent; (ii) standardisedguidelines for uncertainty evaluation of areal surface parameters are needed for users; (iii) it is essentialthat the performance characteristics (and especially the spatial frequency response) of an instrument isunderstood prior to a measurement.