People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mader, Heidy M.
University of Bristol
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (6/6 displayed)
- 2020The microanalysis of iron and sulphur oxidation states in silicate glass - Understanding the effects of beam damagecitations
- 2019Low analytical totals in EPMA of hydrous silicate glass due to sub-surface chargingcitations
- 2018High spatial resolution analysis of the iron oxidation state in silicate glasses using the electron probecitations
- 2018High spatial resolution analysis of the iron oxidation state in silicate glasses using the electron probecitations
- 2011Rheology of magmas with bimodal crystal size and shape distributions: insights from analog experimentscitations
- 2007Dielectric permittivity measurements on ice cores: implications for interpretation of radar to yield glacial unfrozen water contentcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Low analytical totals in EPMA of hydrous silicate glass due to sub-surface charging
Abstract
<p>The major and minor element chemistry of silicate glass is commonly measured using electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA). The volatile content (H<sub>2</sub>O ± CO<sub>2</sub>) can, additionally, be quantified using “volatiles by difference” (VBD), but a review of literature data shows that this method consistently overestimates the volatile content. We propose that sub-surface charging during EPMA reduces analytical totals, consequently elevating VBD. Sub-surface charging produces an internal electric field due to trapped implanted electrons, resulting in fewer X-rays being generated and their depth of generation being shallower. The maximum electric field strength required to produce the observed overestimation of VBD is calculated to be ~10<sup>−1</sup> V·nm<sup>−1</sup>. Crystals are often used as standards for glass analysis but, as amorphous materials have more defects in the band gap, glasses can trap more electrons resulting in greater amounts of sub-surface charging. As this is not included in matrix corrections, it causes errors for glass analyses, but not for crystal analyses. By calibrating VBD using hydrous glass standards, the effect of charging can be incorporated, and volatile contents can be determined to an accuracy of ±0.1 wt%, compared to overestimation by ~1 wt% using conventional VBD methods.</p>