Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lefferts, Leon

  • Google
  • 7
  • 32
  • 124

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2023Modelling of the catalytic initiation of methane coupling under non-oxidative conditions7citations
  • 2022Enhanced catalytic activity and stability of nanoshaped Ni/CeO2 for CO2 methanation in micro-monoliths22citations
  • 2022Enhanced catalytic activity and stability of nanoshaped Ni/CeO2 for CO2 methanation in micro-monoliths22citations
  • 2018Non-oxidative methane coupling to C2 hydrocarbons in a microwave plasma reactor32citations
  • 2016Carbon Nanofibers Grown on Large Woven Cloths: Morphology and Properties of Growth7citations
  • 2015Synthesis of Carbon Nanofibers on Large Woven Cloth7citations
  • 2011Carbon nanofibers in catalytic membrane microreactors27citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Thybaut, J. W.
1 / 1 shared
Pirro, L.
1 / 2 shared
Mendes, P. S. F.
1 / 1 shared
Banerjee, Aayan
1 / 3 shared
Postma, Rolf
1 / 2 shared
Faria, Jimmy
1 / 3 shared
Navarro, Juan Carlos
1 / 1 shared
García-Moncada, Nuria
1 / 1 shared
Odriozola, José Antonio
1 / 10 shared
Odriozola Gordón, José Antonio
1 / 12 shared
García Moncada, Nuria
1 / 1 shared
Navarro De Miguel, Juan Carlos
1 / 2 shared
Faria, Jimmy A.
1 / 1 shared
Peeters, Floran
1 / 2 shared
Minea, Teofil
1 / 1 shared
Van Rooij, Gerardus
1 / 2 shared
Zoethout, Erwin
1 / 3 shared
Graswinckel, Martijn F.
1 / 1 shared
Van De Sanden, Richard
1 / 8 shared
Cents, Toine
1 / 1 shared
Warnet, Laurent L.
2 / 54 shared
Kotanjac, Zeljko
2 / 2 shared
Akkerman, Remko
2 / 423 shared
Koysin, V.
2 / 3 shared
Bor, Teunis Cornelis
1 / 12 shared
Lammertink, Rob
1 / 21 shared
Aran, H. C.
1 / 1 shared
Wessling, Matthias
1 / 35 shared
Benes, Nieck E.
1 / 6 shared
Er, S.
1 / 1 shared
Benito, S. Pacheco
1 / 1 shared
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W. J.
1 / 7 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2018
2016
2015
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Thybaut, J. W.
  • Pirro, L.
  • Mendes, P. S. F.
  • Banerjee, Aayan
  • Postma, Rolf
  • Faria, Jimmy
  • Navarro, Juan Carlos
  • García-Moncada, Nuria
  • Odriozola, José Antonio
  • Odriozola Gordón, José Antonio
  • García Moncada, Nuria
  • Navarro De Miguel, Juan Carlos
  • Faria, Jimmy A.
  • Peeters, Floran
  • Minea, Teofil
  • Van Rooij, Gerardus
  • Zoethout, Erwin
  • Graswinckel, Martijn F.
  • Van De Sanden, Richard
  • Cents, Toine
  • Warnet, Laurent L.
  • Kotanjac, Zeljko
  • Akkerman, Remko
  • Koysin, V.
  • Bor, Teunis Cornelis
  • Lammertink, Rob
  • Aran, H. C.
  • Wessling, Matthias
  • Benes, Nieck E.
  • Er, S.
  • Benito, S. Pacheco
  • Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W. J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Modelling of the catalytic initiation of methane coupling under non-oxidative conditions

  • Thybaut, J. W.
  • Pirro, L.
  • Mendes, P. S. F.
  • Banerjee, Aayan
  • Postma, Rolf
  • Lefferts, Leon
Abstract

The experimentally observed interplay between catalytic activation of methane on Fe©SiO2 and gas-phase free radical methane coupling under non-oxidative conditions is analyzed by mechanistic modeling as well as by experiments. For the modeling, an off-the shelf gas-phase model, AramcoMech 3.0, was used unaltered to keep the number of adjustable parameters as low as possible. It was complemented by surface reactions specifically accounting for methane activation to methyl radicals. The model was validated against an independent set of experimental data and exhibited good accordance. The model accurately captured the significant contribution of gas-phase reactions responsible for methane conversion in the post-catalytic zone, indicative of gas-phase autocatalytic methane coupling. The low-activity induction period in gas-phase methane pyrolysis can effectively be overcome by adequate catalytic activation. Results show that the catalytic reaction only influences the activity of the system, with gas-phase reactions dictating the selectivity distribution. Simulations demonstrated that the optimum catalytic conversion roughly amounts to 4 % at 1000 °C and 1 atm. An equivalent effect can be reached by adding ca. 2 % of ethane or ethylene to the feed. Detailed reaction-path analyses were employed to corroborate these phenomena. Gas-phase reactions were found to be very rapid at 1000 °C, hence determining the product selectivity, without impact from either catalyst or C2 hydrocarbon addition. Current, freely available gas-phase models lack the required accuracy for detailed kinetic modeling of the product distribution, showing the requirement for the development of a dedicate non-oxidative methane coupling model.

Topics
  • pyrolysis
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • phase
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • activation