Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Goncalves, Alf

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 14

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Tubular photobioreactors illuminated with LEDs to boost microalgal biomass production14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Porto, B.
1 / 1 shared
Silva, Tfcvl
1 / 1 shared
Esteves, Af
1 / 1 shared
Pires, Jcm
1 / 1 shared
De Souza, Smagu
1 / 2 shared
Vilar, Vjp
1 / 17 shared
De Souza, Aau
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Porto, B.
  • Silva, Tfcvl
  • Esteves, Af
  • Pires, Jcm
  • De Souza, Smagu
  • Vilar, Vjp
  • De Souza, Aau
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Tubular photobioreactors illuminated with LEDs to boost microalgal biomass production

  • Porto, B.
  • Goncalves, Alf
  • Silva, Tfcvl
  • Esteves, Af
  • Pires, Jcm
  • De Souza, Smagu
  • Vilar, Vjp
  • De Souza, Aau
Abstract

This work proposes distinct configurations for tubular photobioreactors (PBRs) illuminated with specific and adequate light wavelength provided by LEDs. The PBRs are characterized by an involute/flat reflective surface around/below a cylindrical borosilicate glass tube that is illuminated by a LEDs panel located above. Reflectors can enlarge the absorber tube's illuminated area, enabling a uniform (spatial and temporal) light distribution across the culture vessel. Additionally, high-energy-efficient LEDs can minimize heat generation and energetic-related costs. Coupling these two factors can result in higher light utilization efficiency and photosynthetic activity. Depending on the reflector design, almost all the light arriving at the collector aperture can be collected and available for microalgal cultivation. Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) growth was evaluated as a function of the reflector geometry (flat (F), simple double parabola (SP) and traditional double parabola (DP)) and material (anodized aluminum with (MS) and without (R85) protective coating and stainless steel (SS)). C. vulgaris growth as a function of time was found to be in good agreement with the actinometric results, where the parabolic reflectors (SP and DP) made of higher specular reflectance materials (R85 and MS) were the most efficient systems. Conversely, energy-based specific growth rates slightly increased as the photon flux decreased, signaling an energetic efficiency loss due to the low transmissibility of microalgal suspensions. Additional tests using two absorber tubes (spaced between 12.5 and 75.0 mm) over the R85-F reflector were also carried out, showing that the distance of 50.0 mm led to the best compromise between the specific growth rates and biomass productivities per square meter of solar collector. Under these conditions, higher efficiency on the photonic energy usage was attained compared to the single-tube test.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • stainless steel
  • aluminium
  • glass
  • glass
  • mass spectrometry