Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Van Langenhove, Herman

  • Google
  • 1
  • 9
  • 17

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Techno-economic assessment of surrogate-based real-time control and monitoring of secondary effluent ozonation at pilot scale17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nopens, Ingmar
1 / 2 shared
Demeestere, Kristof
1 / 4 shared
Weemaes, Marjoleine
1 / 1 shared
Wieland, Arne
1 / 1 shared
Ried, Achim
1 / 1 shared
Stapel, Harald
1 / 1 shared
Chys, Michael
1 / 1 shared
Van Hulle, Stijn
1 / 6 shared
Audenaert, Wim
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nopens, Ingmar
  • Demeestere, Kristof
  • Weemaes, Marjoleine
  • Wieland, Arne
  • Ried, Achim
  • Stapel, Harald
  • Chys, Michael
  • Van Hulle, Stijn
  • Audenaert, Wim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Techno-economic assessment of surrogate-based real-time control and monitoring of secondary effluent ozonation at pilot scale

  • Nopens, Ingmar
  • Van Langenhove, Herman
  • Demeestere, Kristof
  • Weemaes, Marjoleine
  • Wieland, Arne
  • Ried, Achim
  • Stapel, Harald
  • Chys, Michael
  • Van Hulle, Stijn
  • Audenaert, Wim
Abstract

During secondary effluent ozonation, real-time control of the ozone dose based on the water quality is essential to minimize operational costs and by-product formation (i.e. two of the main hurdles hindering a fast implementation of the technology). In this pilot-scale study, the ozone dose was controlled via online UV absorbance (UVA(254)) measurements. Only one sensor was used although a AUVA(254)-based control strategy was applied. The practical implications of online spectral sensors and the effect of effluent dynamics in terms of load (i.e. Dissolved Organic Carbon or DOC concentration) and composition (i.e. reactivity) was studied in relation to the applied control strategies. The one sensor approach - presented for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge - reduced the negative impact of sensor fouling. The use of manual and ultrasonic cleaning is recommended as it results in significantly less fouling (i.e. a factor of 6 difference). Additionally, the variable effluent reactivity showed to be more influential than the effluent load in determining the ozone dose. The use of AUVA(254) ensured the supply of the required ozone doses during varying water quality and weather conditions, and at lower operational costs than more common control strategies (up to 22% of savings). Flow or load proportional strategies were not able to cope with the dynamic ozone demand of the effluent. However, the required additional response time of the AUVA(254)-strategy might be a disadvantage and could be tackled using hybrid control approaches including load-based dosing (i.e. O-3:DOC ratio based) and the use of a combined feedback-feedforward system.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • ultrasonic