Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

No, Young Jung

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 19

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Development of a bioactive and radiopaque bismuth doped baghdadite ceramic for bone tissue engineering19citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Foley, Matthew
1 / 3 shared
Nguyen, Tien
1 / 2 shared
Lu, Zufu
1 / 5 shared
Zreiqat, Hala
1 / 16 shared
Fei, Frank
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Foley, Matthew
  • Nguyen, Tien
  • Lu, Zufu
  • Zreiqat, Hala
  • Fei, Frank
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Development of a bioactive and radiopaque bismuth doped baghdadite ceramic for bone tissue engineering

  • Foley, Matthew
  • Nguyen, Tien
  • Lu, Zufu
  • Zreiqat, Hala
  • No, Young Jung
  • Fei, Frank
Abstract

<p>Baghdadite (Ca<sub>3</sub>ZrSi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub>, BAG), is a Zr-doped calcium silicate that has outstanding bioactivity both in vitro and in vivo. Bioceramic scaffolds should be sufficiently radiopaque to be distinguishable in vivo from surrounding bone structures. To enhance the radiopacity of BAG, this study investigated the effect of incorporating bismuth ions into its crystalline structure (Bi<sub>x</sub>Ca<sub>3-x</sub>ZrSi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub>, x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5; BAG, Bi0.1-BAG, Bi0.2-BAG, Bi0.5-BAG, respectively). Monophasic baghdadite was retained after bismuth ion incorporation up to x = 0.2 at calcination temperatures of 1350 °C. When pressed and sintered, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy showed that BAG and Bi0.1-BAG retained crystalline homogeneity, but Bi0.2-BAG formed zirconium-rich crystalline regions. BAG, Bi0.1-BAG and Bi0.2-BAG exhibited non-degradation after 56 days of immersion in culture medium. Bi0.1-BAG exhibited the lowest change in culture medium pH (+0.0), compared to BAG (+0.7) and Bi0.2-BAG (+0.2) after 56 days of culture media immersion. Bi0.1-BAG exhibited similar strength and modulus to BAG (σ: 200–290 MPa; E: 4–5 GPa), and significantly higher compressive strength and modulus versus Bi0.2-BAG (σ: 150–200 MPa; E: 3.5–4 GPa) across 56 days of aqueous immersion. In vitro studies using primary human bone derived cells (HOBs) demonstrated a significant increase in HOBs proliferation when cultured on Bi0.1-BAG for seven days compared to BAG and Bi0.2-BAG. Importantly, Bi0.1-BAG showed increased radiopacity by ~33%, when compared to BAG, and by ~115% when compared to biphasic calcium phosphate. The properties of Bi0.1-BAG show promise for its use as a bioactive ceramic with sufficient radiopacity for treatment of bone defects.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • zirconium
  • strength
  • defect
  • ceramic
  • Calcium
  • X-ray spectroscopy
  • Bismuth
  • bioactivity