Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Turunen, Mikael J.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 13
  • 81

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2017Neutron tomographic imaging of bone-implant interface23citations
  • 2016Bone mineral crystal size and organization vary across mature rat bone cortex58citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Perdikouri, Christina
1 / 1 shared
Tudisco, Erika
1 / 5 shared
Kaestner, Anders
1 / 9 shared
Hall, Stephen A.
1 / 19 shared
Isaksson, Hanna
2 / 17 shared
Tägil, Magnus
2 / 6 shared
Cann, Sophie Le
1 / 6 shared
Guizar-Sicairos, Manuel
1 / 18 shared
Kaspersen, Jørn D.
1 / 1 shared
Schaff, Florian
1 / 3 shared
Jurvelin, Jukka S.
1 / 11 shared
Bech, Martin
1 / 7 shared
Olsson, Ulf
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Perdikouri, Christina
  • Tudisco, Erika
  • Kaestner, Anders
  • Hall, Stephen A.
  • Isaksson, Hanna
  • Tägil, Magnus
  • Cann, Sophie Le
  • Guizar-Sicairos, Manuel
  • Kaspersen, Jørn D.
  • Schaff, Florian
  • Jurvelin, Jukka S.
  • Bech, Martin
  • Olsson, Ulf
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Neutron tomographic imaging of bone-implant interface

  • Perdikouri, Christina
  • Tudisco, Erika
  • Turunen, Mikael J.
  • Kaestner, Anders
  • Hall, Stephen A.
  • Isaksson, Hanna
  • Tägil, Magnus
  • Cann, Sophie Le
Abstract

<p>Metal implants, in e.g. joint replacements, are generally considered to be a success. As mechanical stability is important for the longevity of a prosthesis, the biological reaction of the bone to the mechanical loading conditions after implantation and during remodelling determines its fate. The bone reaction at the implant interface can be studied using high-resolution imaging. However, commonly used X-ray imaging suffers from image artefacts in the close proximity of metal implants, which limit the possibility to closely examine the bone at the bone-implant interface. An alternative ex vivo 3D imaging method is offered by neutron tomography. Neutrons interact with matter differently than X-rays; therefore, this study explores if neutron tomography may be used to enrich studies on bone-implant interfaces. A stainless steel screw was implanted in a rat tibia and left to integrate for 6 weeks. After extracting the tibia, the bone-screw construct was imaged using X-ray and neutron tomography at different resolutions. Artefacts were visible in all X-ray images in the close proximity of the implant, which limited the ability to accurately quantify the bone around the implant. In contrast, neutron images were free of metal artefacts, enabling full analysis of the bone-implant interface. Trabecular structural bone parameters were quantified in the metaphyseal bone away from the implant using all imaging modalities. The structural bone parameters were similar for all images except for the lowest resolution neutron images. This study presents the first proof-of-concept that neutron tomographic imaging can be used for ex-vivo evaluation of bone microstructure and that it constitutes a viable, new tool to study the bone-implant interface tissue remodelling.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • stainless steel
  • Neutron tomography