Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yoo, Daniel

  • Google
  • 2
  • 11
  • 51

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2014The physicochemical characterization and in vivo response of micro/nanoporous bioactive ceramic particulate bone graft materials11citations
  • 2014Nanometer-scale features on micrometer-scale surface texturing40citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Manne, Lakshmipradha
1 / 1 shared
Anchieta, Rodolfo
1 / 2 shared
Machado, Lucas
1 / 1 shared
Gangolli, Riddhi
1 / 1 shared
Witek, Lukasz
1 / 42 shared
Jimbo, Ryo
2 / 7 shared
Coelho, Paulo G.
2 / 36 shared
Tovar, Nick
2 / 14 shared
Karunagaran, Sanjay
1 / 1 shared
Takayama, Tadahiro
1 / 1 shared
Janal, Malvin N.
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Manne, Lakshmipradha
  • Anchieta, Rodolfo
  • Machado, Lucas
  • Gangolli, Riddhi
  • Witek, Lukasz
  • Jimbo, Ryo
  • Coelho, Paulo G.
  • Tovar, Nick
  • Karunagaran, Sanjay
  • Takayama, Tadahiro
  • Janal, Malvin N.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Nanometer-scale features on micrometer-scale surface texturing

  • Yoo, Daniel
  • Karunagaran, Sanjay
  • Jimbo, Ryo
  • Takayama, Tadahiro
  • Coelho, Paulo G.
  • Janal, Malvin N.
  • Tovar, Nick
Abstract

<p>Micro- and nanoscale surface modifications have been the focus of multiple studies in the pursuit of accelerating bone apposition or osseointegration at the implant surface. Here, we evaluated histological and nanomechanical properties, and gene expression, for a microblasted surface presenting nanometer-scale texture within a micrometer-scale texture (MB) (Ossean™ Surface, Intra-Lock International, Boca Raton, FL) versus a dual-acid etched surface presenting texture at the micrometer-scale only (AA), in a rodent femur model for 1, 2, 4, and 8. weeks in vivo. Following animal sacrifice, samples were evaluated in terms of histomorphometry, biomechanical properties through nanoindentation, and gene expression by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Although the histomorphometric, and gene expression analysis results were not significantly different between MB and AA at 4 and 8. weeks, significant differences were seen at 1 and 2. weeks. The expression of the genes encoding collagen type I (COL-1), and osteopontin (OPN) was significantly higher for MB than for AA at 1. week, indicating up-regulated osteoprogenitor and osteoblast differentiation. At 2. weeks, significantly up-regulated expression of the genes for COL-1, runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2), osterix, and osteocalcin (OCN) indicated progressive mineralization in newly formed bone. The nanomechanical properties tested by the nanoindentation presented significantly higher-rank hardness and elastic modulus for the MB compared to AA at all time points tested. In conclusion, the nanotopographical featured surfaces presented an overall higher host-to-implant response compared to the microtextured only surfaces. The statistical differences observed in some of the osteogenic gene expression between the two groups may shed some insight into the role of surface texture and its extent in the observed bone healing mechanisms.</p>

Topics
  • surface
  • hardness
  • nanoindentation
  • texture