People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Deroose, Nicolas
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (2/2 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Tailorable acrylate-endcapped urethane-based polymers for precision in digital light processing : versatile solutions for biomedical applications
Abstract
Bioengineering seeks to replicate biological tissues exploiting scaffolds often based on polymeric biomaterials. Digital light processing (DLP) has emerged as a potent technique to fabricate tissue engineering (TE) scaffolds. However, the scarcity of suitable biomaterials with desired physico-chemical properties along with processing capabilities limits DLP's potential. Herein, we introduce acrylate-endcapped urethane-based polymers (AUPs) for precise physico-chemical tuning while ensuring optimal computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) mimicry. Varying the polymer backbone (i.e. poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) versus poly(propylene glycol) (PPG)) and photo-crosslinkable endcap (i.e. di-acrylate versus hexa-acrylate), we synthesized a series of photo-crosslinkable materials labeled as UPEG2, UPEG6, UPPG2 and UPPG6. Comprehensive material characterization including physico-chemical and biological evaluations, was followed by a DLP processing parametric study for each material. The impact of the number of acrylate groups per polymer (2 to 6) on the physico-chemical properties was pronounced, as reflected by a reduced swelling, lower water contact angles, accelerated crosslinking kinetics, and increased Young's moduli upon increasing the acrylate content. Furthermore, the different polymer backbones also exerted a substantial effect on the properties, including the absence of crystallinity, remarkably reduced swelling behaviors, a slight reduction in Young's modulus, and slower crosslinking kinetics for UPPG vs UPEG. The mechanical characteristics of DLP-printed samples showcased the ability to tailor the materials' stiffness (ranging from 0.4 to 5.3 MPa) by varying endcap chemistry and/or backbone. The in vitro cell assays confirmed biocompatibility of the material as such and the DLP-printed discs. Furthermore, the structural integrity of 3D scaffolds was preserved both in dry and swollen state. By adjusting the backbone chemistry or acrylate content, the post-swelling dimensions could be customized towards the targeted application. This study showcases the potential of these materials offering tailorable properties to serve many biomedical applications such as cartilage TE.