People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Monteiro, Fj
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2023Full physicochemical and biocompatibility characterization of a supercritical CO2 sterilized nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan biodegradable scaffold for periodontal bone regenerationcitations
- 202145S5 Bioglass-Derived Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds Containing Niobium Obtained by Gelcasting Methodcitations
- 2020Femtosecond laser microstructuring of alumina toughened zirconia for surface functionalization of dental implantscitations
- 2019Influence of PLLA/PCL/HA Scaffold Fiber Orientation on Mechanical Properties and Osteoblast Behaviorcitations
- 2019Inhibitory Effect of 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carbohydrazonamides Derivatives Against Candida spp. Biofilm on Nanohydroxyapatite Substratecitations
- 2018Highly porous 45S5 bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds by gelcasting of foamscitations
- 2018Micropatterned Silica Films with Nanohydroxyapatite for Y-TZP Implantscitations
- 2016Biodegradation, biocompatibility, and osteoconduction evaluation of collagen-nanohydroxyapatite cryogels for bone tissue regenerationcitations
- 2014Modulation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cell and human gingival fibroblast behavior by micropatterned silica coating surfaces for zirconia dental implant applicationscitations
- 2014Influence of nanohydroxyapatite surface properties on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formationcitations
- 2012Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa onto nanohydroxyapatite as a bone regeneration materialcitations
- 2008PLD bioactive ceramic films: the influence of CaO-P(2)O(5) glass additions to hydroxyapatite on the proliferation and morphology of osteblastic like-cellscitations
- 2004Production of porus hydroxyapatite with potential for controlled drug delivery
- 2004Porous hydroxyapatite and glass reinforced hydroxyapatite for controlled release of sodium ampicillin
- 2000Microstructural dependence of Young's and shear moduli of P2O5 glass reinforced hydroxyapatite for biomedical applicationscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Full physicochemical and biocompatibility characterization of a supercritical CO2 sterilized nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan biodegradable scaffold for periodontal bone regeneration
Abstract
Despite bone's innate self-renewal capability, some periodontal pathologic and traumatic defects' size inhibits full spontaneous regeneration. This current research characterized a 3D porous biodegradable nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan (nHAp/CS, 70/30) scaffold for periodontal bone regeneration, which preparation method includes the final solvent extraction and sterilization through supercritical CO2 (scCO2). Micro-CT analysis revealed the fully interconnected porous microstructure of the nHAp/CS scaffold (total porosity 78 %, medium pore size 200 mu m) which is critical for bone regeneration. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed HAp crystals forming on the surface of the nHAp/CS scaffold after 21 days in simulated body fluid, demonstrating its bioactivity in vitro. The presence of nHAp in the scaffolds promoted a significantly lower biodegradation rate compared to a plain CS scaffold in PBS. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed their viscoelasticity, but the presence of nHAp significantly enhanced the storage modulus (42.34 +/- 6.09 kPa at 10 Hz after 28 days in PBS), showing that it may support bone ingrowth at low-load bearing bone defects. Both scaffold types significantly inhibited the growth, attachment and colony formation abilities of S. aureus and E. coli, enhancing the relevance of chitosan in the grafts' composition for the naturally contaminated oral environment. At SEM and laser scanning confocal microscopy, MG63 cells showed normal morphology and could adhere and proliferate inside the biomaterials' porous structure, especially for the nHAp/CS scaffold, reaching higher pro-liferative rate at day 14. MG63 cells seeded within nHAp/CS scaffolds presented a higher expression of RUNX2, collagen A1 and Sp7 osteogenic genes compared to the CS samples. The in vivo subcutaneous implantation in mice of both scaffold types showed lower biodegradability with the preservation of the scaffolds porous structure that allowed the ingrowth of connective tissue until 5 weeks. Histology shows an intensive and progressive ingrowth of new vessels and collagen between the 3rd and the 5th week, especially for the nHAp/CS scaffold. So far, the scCO2 method enabled the production of a cost-effective and environment-friendly ready-to-use nHAp/CS scaffold with microstructural, chemical, mechanical and biocompatibility features that make it a suitable bone graft alternative for defect sites in an adverse environment as in periodontitis and peri-implantitis.