Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ebels, Tjark

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 17

University Medical Center Groningen

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017Implant Failure17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Woudstra, Willem
1 / 2 shared
Touw, Daniel
1 / 2 shared
Willems, Tineke
1 / 1 shared
Erasmus, Michiel
1 / 1 shared
Sharma, Prashant K.
1 / 17 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Woudstra, Willem
  • Touw, Daniel
  • Willems, Tineke
  • Erasmus, Michiel
  • Sharma, Prashant K.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Implant Failure

  • Woudstra, Willem
  • Ebels, Tjark
  • Touw, Daniel
  • Willems, Tineke
  • Erasmus, Michiel
  • Sharma, Prashant K.
Abstract

<p>Background. Three European centers have recently reported dramatic failures of the STRATOS titanium system, approved in Europe and the United States since 2007 and meant for pectus repair, without detailed exploration of its causes.</p><p>Methods. Failed implants (fractures or loosened crimp connectors) were surgically explanted from 12 patients and biopsies taken from surrounding discolored tissue. Detailed failure analysis was performed to find the cause of failures. Inductively coupled mass spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive radiograph spectroscopy was used to determine titanium and to visualize titanium wear debris in histologic sections.</p><p>Results. Implants failed in all patients by fracture of connecting bar, fracture of lateral bar at reduced cross-section, loosening of crimp connector, or different combinations of these. All fracture surfaces were clean and smooth without any signs of plastic deformation. Failure already started at 10 months after implantation and continued for 2.5 years. Biopsy of discolored tissue around the failures showed 0.4 mg to 105 mg titanium per gram tissue, and close observation showed titanium wear debris.</p><p>Conclusions. Combined tensile, compressive, bending, and torsional loading on the implant during each breathing cycle caused loosening and fatigue fractures, which led to failure. Excessive rubbing at the fracture and loosening site caused the release of large amounts of titanium in the surrounding tissue, which may lead to metallosis. Long and sharp pieces of failed implant in the cardiothoracic region is a grave danger to vital organs. All patients should be closely followed, and in our opinion, all implants should be removed. Serious reconsideration for clinical use of this implant is necessary. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • fatigue
  • titanium