Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jiang, Xinquan

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 46

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Unraveling the influence of channel size and shape in 3D printed ceramic scaffolds on osteogenesis8citations
  • 2021Redefining architectural effects in 3D printed scaffolds through rational design for optimal bone tissue regeneration38citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Entezari, Ali
2 / 4 shared
Wu, Qianju
1 / 1 shared
Roohani, Iman
1 / 5 shared
Lu, Zufu
1 / 5 shared
Zreiqat, Hala
2 / 16 shared
Li, Qing
1 / 7 shared
Dunstan, Colin R.
2 / 6 shared
Wang, Xiao
1 / 18 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Entezari, Ali
  • Wu, Qianju
  • Roohani, Iman
  • Lu, Zufu
  • Zreiqat, Hala
  • Li, Qing
  • Dunstan, Colin R.
  • Wang, Xiao
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Redefining architectural effects in 3D printed scaffolds through rational design for optimal bone tissue regeneration

  • Entezari, Ali
  • Zreiqat, Hala
  • Wang, Xiao
  • Dunstan, Colin R.
  • Jiang, Xinquan
Abstract

<p>Internal architecture of tissue scaffolds plays a significant role in their ability to heal critical-size bone defects. Many studies have investigated these effects but lack isolating architectural features in 3D space, hindering optimization of pore shape to improve bone ingrowth and consequently clinical outcome. To address this challenge, we developed a systematic design strategy and a high-fidelity and -precision ceramic printing technique using a stereolithography desktop printer. We used these techniques to print 5 scaffold architectures with different surface convexities/concavities, pore interconnectivities, and permeabilities, while maintaining the same porosity, average pore size, and surface area. We determined the mechanical effects of the architecture using mechanical tests with in-situ imaging, finite element, and computational fluid dynamic simulations. The effects of architecture on bioactivity and bone ingrowth were determined in a rabbit calvarial critical-size defect model at 12-week implantation, using µ-computed tomography, and histology. The results showed that bone ingrowth is significantly affected by pore interconnectivity in 3D space and maximum fluid permeability in 3D regardless of flow direction, but not permeability in one or few directions. Surface convexity/concavity did not affect bone formation in our 3D scaffolds. Bone ingrowth in scaffolds with highly interconnected pores resulted in a significantly tougher and stronger bioceramic/bone composites, compared to the inherently brittle scaffolds pre-implantation. Our findings provide a rational design of 3D scaffolds architectures for effective translation to the clinic and could be used to predict the tissue regeneration capacity of scaffolds with other architectures or made of other materials.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • surface
  • simulation
  • tomography
  • composite
  • permeability
  • porosity
  • ceramic
  • bioactivity