| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Vinhais, Carlos
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (3/3 displayed)
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Front passivation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells using Al2O3
Abstract
<p>In the past years, the strategies used to break the Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> (CIGS) light to power conversion efficiency world record value were based on improvements of the absorber optoelectronic and crystalline properties, mainly using complex post-deposition treatments. To reach even higher efficiency values, further advances in the solar cell architecture are needed, in particular, with respect to the CIGS interfaces. In this study, we evaluate the structural, morphological and optoelectronic impact of an Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer as a potential front passivation layer on the CIGS properties, as well as an Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> tunneling layer between CIGS and CdS. Morphological and structural analyses reveal that the use of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> alone is not detrimental to CIGS, although it does not resist to the CdS chemical bath deposition. The CIGS optoelectronic properties degrade when the CdS is deposited on top of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Nonetheless, when Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is used alone, the optoelectronic measurements reveal a positive impact of this inclusion such as a very low concentration of interface defects while keeping the same CIGS recombination channels. Thus, we suggest that an Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> front passivation layer can be successfully used with alternative buffer layers. Depth-resolved microscopic analysis of the CIGS interface with slow-muons strongly suggests for the first time that low-energy muon spin spectroscopy (LE-µSR) is sensitive to both charge carrier separation and bulk recombination in complex semiconductors. The demonstration that Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> has the potential to be used as a front passivation layer is of significant importance, considering that Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> has been widely studied as rear interface passivation material.</p>