Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Weisbjerg, M. R.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 56

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2009Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows56citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lund, Peter
1 / 4 shared
Larsen, M.
1 / 1 shared
Hvelplund, T.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lund, Peter
  • Larsen, M.
  • Hvelplund, T.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Digestion site of starch from cereals and legumes in lactating dairy cows

  • Lund, Peter
  • Larsen, M.
  • Hvelplund, T.
  • Weisbjerg, M. R.
Abstract

The effect of grinding and rolling (<em>i.e.</em> processing) of cereals and legumes (<em>i.e.</em> source) on site of starch digestion in lactating dairy cows was tested according to a 2×2 factorial design using a dataset derived from an overall dataset compiled from four experiments conducted at our laboratory that investigated effects of various processing techniques on digestion kinetics. Data originated from four experiments with cows cannulated in the rumen, duodenum and ileum, and fed rations composed of the respective starch source and grass-clover silage balanced with soy bean meal and a mineral premix. In addition to apparent digestibilities of starch in the rumen, small intestine and hind gut, true ruminal starch digestibilties and duodenal flow of microbial starch was estimated by regression analysis. There was an interaction between starch source and processing, as the apparent and true ruminal digestibility of starch was decreased by rolling for legumes, whereas the three other source by processing combinations did not differ. The duodenal flow of microbial starch was estimated to 276 g/d as the intercept in the regression analysis. Apparent ruminal digestibilities of starch seemed to underestimate true ruminal digestibility in rations with low starch intake due to a relatively higher contribution of microbial starch to total duodenal starch flow compared to rumen escape feed starch. The small intestinal and total tract digestibility of legume starch was lower compared with starch from cereals. Rolling reduced the small intestinal and total tract digestibility of starch from both cereals and legumes compared to grinding. Reductions in ruminal starch digestion were generally not associated with increases in small intestinal starch digestion, but were associated with increases in hind gut and reductions in total tract digestion of starch. Starch from legumes had lower ruminal and small intestinal digestibilities compared to starch from barley and wheat, indicating that action of bacterial and pancreatic amylase is limited by the same factors. Rolling did not provide sufficient physical processing of legume seeds to obtain a high digestibility of starch before the hind gut.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • experiment
  • grinding