Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Forrestal, David

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 99

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Mechanical behaviour of flexible 3D printed gyroid structures as a tuneable replacement for soft padding foam48citations
  • 2020Auxetic tubular scaffolds via melt electrowriting51citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lamont, Riki
1 / 1 shared
Powell, Sean
1 / 2 shared
Daley, Ryan
2 / 2 shared
Singh, Dilpreet
1 / 3 shared
Slattery, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lamont, Riki
  • Powell, Sean
  • Daley, Ryan
  • Singh, Dilpreet
  • Slattery, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical behaviour of flexible 3D printed gyroid structures as a tuneable replacement for soft padding foam

  • Lamont, Riki
  • Powell, Sean
  • Forrestal, David
  • Daley, Ryan
  • Singh, Dilpreet
  • Slattery, Peter
Abstract

<p>Various areas of healthcare utilise custom foam cushioning to treat or mitigate conditions like pressure ulcers, or to provide personalised support structures for patients with specific clinical needs. Polyurethane foams are often used; however, such materials require significant time and expertise to combine different foam types into a device that provides sufficient structural support in some areas, with soft pressure distribution in others. In this paper, flexible 3D printed gyroid based metamaterials are investigated as a tuneable replacement for polyurethane foams. The impact of changing key gyroid structural characteristics on the material's mechanical response is examined. Samples with six different unit cell geometries for each of two flexible TPU 3D printing filaments (NinjaFlex and Flexion X60) were produced using fused filament fabrication, tested, and compared to three types of conventional polyurethane rehabilitation foam. Compression tests were conducted focussing on compressive stress-strain response, strain rate effect, print layer effect, and cyclic fatigue behaviour. In all tests it was observed that gyroid samples of both filament types were able to produce compressive responses comparable to the foams. Solid volume fraction was determined as the critical gyroid geometric parameter that influenced compressive response, and solid volume fractions capable of reproducing the specific response of each of the three rehab foams were determined. It is shown that 3D printed gyroid materials are a viable replacement for soft polyurethane foams, and the direct control of material response possible with simple geometric changes means such metamaterials may lead to improved optimisation of rehabilitation cushions.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • fatigue
  • compression test
  • metamaterial
  • gyroid