People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mirzaali, Mohammad, J.
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2024Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printingcitations
- 2024Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratiocitations
- 20244D Printing for Biomedical Applicationscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterialscitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Mechanisms of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Merging strut-based and minimal surface meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Nonlinear coarse-graining models for 3D printed multi-material biomimetic compositescitations
- 2022Magneto‐/ electro‐responsive polymers toward manufacturing, characterization, and biomedical/ soft robotic applicationscitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2021Dynamic characterization of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials with tunable elastic propertiescitations
- 2021Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopycitations
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2020Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printingcitations
- 2020Magnetorheological elastomer compositescitations
- 2019Auxeticity and stiffness of random networkscitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts through laser metal deposition (LMD)citations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of metals using powder bed-based technologies
- 2019Fracture Behavior of Bio-Inspired Functionally Graded Soft–Hard Composites Made by Multi-Material 3D Printingcitations
- 2018Multi-material 3D printed mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2017Rational design of soft mechanical metamaterialscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopy
Abstract
Micro- and nano-patterns are gaining increasing attraction in several fields ranging from nanoelectronics to bioengineering. The mechanical properties of the nanostructures (nanopillars, nanotubes, nanowires, etc.) are highly relevant for many applications but challenging to determine. Existing mechanical characterization methods require mounting the testing setup inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and additional sample modification. Here, we propose two atomic force microscopy (AFM) methods, based on contact mode imaging (CMI) and force spectroscopy imaging (FSI), to determine the mechanical characteristics of individual micro- and nanopillars as fabricated, without using SEM. We present the working principles of both methods and two case studies on nanopillars fabricated by additive manufacturing methods: two-photon polymerization (2PP) and electron beam induced deposition (EBID). Various mechanical parameters were determined using CMI and FSI, respectively. For the 2PP nanopillars, we measured the stiffness (13.5 +/- 3.2 N/m and 15.9 +/- 2.6 N/m), the maximum lateral force (883.0 +/- 89.5 nN and 889.6 +/- 113.6 nN), the maximum deflection (64.2 +/- 13.6 nm and 58.3 +/- 14.24 nm), the failure stress (0.3 +/- 0.03 GPa and 0.3 +/- 0.02 GPa), and the adhesion force (56.6 +/- 4.5 mu N and 58.6 +/- 5.2 mu N). For the EBID nanopillars, we measured the failure stress (2.9 +/- 0.2 GPa and 2.7 +/- 0.4 GPa). The similar results obtained using both techniques confirmed the efficacy and consistency of the methods. The proposed methodologies have the potential of enabling otherwise impossible measurements particularly when the specimens need to be tested under wet conditions, such as patterns for mechanobiological studies.