| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lines, David
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2023Single-bit coded excitation for lightweight phase coherence imaging
- 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approachescitations
- 2023In-process non-destructive evaluation of metal additive manufactured components at build using ultrasound and eddy-current approachescitations
- 2023Phased array inspection of narrow-gap weld LOSWF defects for in-process weld inspection
- 2022Towards ultrasound-driven, in-process monitoring & control of GTA welding of multi-pass welds for defect detection & prevention
- 2022Collaborative robotic wire + arc additive manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic non-destructive evaluationcitations
- 2022Investigating ultrasound wave propagation through the coupling medium and non-flat surface of wire + arc additive manufactured components inspected by a PAUT roller-probe
- 2022Automated multi-modal in-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacturing
- 2022Towards real-time ultrasound driven inspection and control of GTA welding processes for high-value manufacturing
- 2022Dual-tandem phased array inspection for imaging near-vertical defects in narrow gap welds
- 2022Targeted eddy current inspection based on ultrasonic feature guided wave screening of resistance seam welds
- 2022In-process non-destructive evaluation of wire + arc additive manufacture components using ultrasound high-temperature dry-coupled roller-probe
- 2022Collaborative robotic Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture and sensor-enabled in-process ultrasonic Non-Destructive Evaluationcitations
- 2022Automated real time eddy current array inspection of nuclear assetscitations
- 2020In-process calibration of a non-destructive testing system used for in-process inspection of multi-pass weldingcitations
- 2020Laser-assisted surface adaptive ultrasound (SAUL) inspection of samples with complex surface profiles using a phased array roller-probe
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire plus arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approachescitations
- 2019Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defectscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Ultrasonic phased array inspection of a Wire + Arc Additive Manufactured (WAAM) sample with intentionally embedded defects
Abstract
In this study, Wire + Arc Additive Manufacture (WAAM) was employed to manufacture a steel specimen with intentionally embedded defects which were subsequently used for calibration of an ultrasonic phased array system and defect sizing. An ABB robot was combined with the Cold Metal Transfer (CMT) Gas Metal Arc (GMA) process to deposit 20 layers of mild steel. Tungsten-carbide balls (ø1-3 mm) were intentionally embedded inside the additive structure after the 4th, 8th, 12th and 18th layers to serve as ultrasonic reflectors, simulating defects within the WAAM sample. An ultrasonic phased array system, consisting of a 5 MHz 64 Element phased array transducer, was used to inspect the WAAM sample non-destructively. The majority of the reflectors were detected successfully using Total Focusing Method (TFM), proving that the tungsten carbide balls were successfully embedded during the WAAM process and also that these are good ultrasonic reflectors. Owing to a lack of standards and codes for the ultrasonic inspection of WAAM samples (A. Lopez, R. Bacelar, et al., 2018), a calibration method and step-by-step inspection strategy were introduced and then used to estimate the size and shape of an unknown lack of fusion (LoF) indication. This was then validated by destructive analysis, showing a good correlation with the phased array results.