Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Villeneuve, François

  • Google
  • 13
  • 19
  • 499

Université Grenoble Alpes

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2023Fast simulation for powder bed fusion process based on thermal field pattern repetitions: application on electron beam melting process1citations
  • 2022Equivalent Material analysis of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfacescitations
  • 2020Analysis of geometrical defects in overhang fabrications in electron beam melting based on thermomechanical simulations and experimental validations20citations
  • 2019Towards a novel thermal criterion for form defects prediction in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing: Finite element modelling and validationcitations
  • 2017Improving dimensional accuracy in EBM using beam characterization and trajectory optimization31citations
  • 2015Evaluation de la chaine numérique en fabrication par Electron Beam Meltingcitations
  • 2015Mechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by Electron Beam Melting151citations
  • 2014New Trajectories in Electron Beam Melting Manufacturing to Reduce Curling Effect17citations
  • 2014Towards Stiffness Prediction of Cellular Structures Made by Electron Beam Melting (EBM)50citations
  • 2013Identification on some design key parameters for additive manufacturing: application on Electron Beam Meltingcitations
  • 2013Règles de Conception pour la Fabrication Additive de Matériaux Cellulaires en Titane par " Electron Beam Melting "citations
  • 2013Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Cellular Structures by Electron Beam Meltingcitations
  • 2012Metallic additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art review and prospects229citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Grandvallet, Christelle
1 / 2 shared
Ghaoui, Soukaina
2 / 2 shared
Ledoux, Yann
2 / 2 shared
Vignat, Frédéric
12 / 16 shared
Museau, Matthieu
3 / 10 shared
Ballu, Alex
2 / 2 shared
Vo, Thanh Hoang
2 / 2 shared
Beraud, Nicolas
1 / 3 shared
Ramírez, E. A.
1 / 1 shared
Pourroy, Franck
1 / 1 shared
Béraud, Nicolas
4 / 6 shared
Chergui, Akram
1 / 1 shared
Dendievel, Rémy
7 / 21 shared
Suard, Mathieu
4 / 7 shared
Lhuissier, Pierre
3 / 31 shared
Blandin, Jean-Jacques
4 / 45 shared
Martin, Guilhem
1 / 33 shared
Lhuissier, P.
1 / 13 shared
Vayre, Benjamin
4 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2020
2019
2017
2015
2014
2013
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Grandvallet, Christelle
  • Ghaoui, Soukaina
  • Ledoux, Yann
  • Vignat, Frédéric
  • Museau, Matthieu
  • Ballu, Alex
  • Vo, Thanh Hoang
  • Beraud, Nicolas
  • Ramírez, E. A.
  • Pourroy, Franck
  • Béraud, Nicolas
  • Chergui, Akram
  • Dendievel, Rémy
  • Suard, Mathieu
  • Lhuissier, Pierre
  • Blandin, Jean-Jacques
  • Martin, Guilhem
  • Lhuissier, P.
  • Vayre, Benjamin
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by Electron Beam Melting

  • Suard, Mathieu
  • Vignat, Frédéric
  • Dendievel, Rémy
  • Lhuissier, Pierre
  • Blandin, Jean-Jacques
  • Villeneuve, François
  • Martin, Guilhem
Abstract

The Electron Beam Melting (EBM) technology enables the manufacturing of new designs and sophisticated geometries. The process is particularly well suited for the fabrication of lattice structures. A standard methodology is presented in order to predict the mechanical response of lattice structures fabricated by EBM. The inner and outer structure of single struts produced by EBM was characterized using X-ray tomography. Struts with a 1 mm diameter and different orientations respect to the build direction were analyzed. The geometry discrepancies between the designed and the fabricated strut were highlighted. Two effects were identified. (i): The produced struts are generally thinner than the designed ones. (ii): Within the produced struts, loads are not transmitted by the entire geometry. It was therefore suggested to separate the strut between the mechanically “efficient and inefficientâ€? matter. The elastic response of the strut was assumed to be represented by a circular cylinder with an equivalent diameter. Two equivalent diameters were defined. The first one is the diameter of an inscribed cylinder whereas the second one is the result of a numerical simulation based on the 3D image of the strut characterized by X-ray tomography. The methodology was then applied to an octet-truss lattice structure. The difference in terms of Young's modulus between both approaches and experimental values were discussed. The mechanical equivalent diameter obtained by numerical simulation on a 3D image of the strut allows to simulate the “trueâ€? properties of the lattice structure by taking into account the manufacturing constraints of the EBM process.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • tomography
  • electron beam melting