| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Kern, Matthias
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2024The Impact of an MDP-Containing Primer on the Properties of Zinc Oxide Networks Infiltrated with BisGMA-TEGDMA and UDMA-TEGDMA Polymerscitations
- 2020Long-term clinical outcome of posterior metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with direct metal laser-sintering technologycitations
- 2019Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 yearscitations
- 2018Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramicscitations
- 2017Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisorscitations
- 2016Biaxial flexural strength of new Bis-GMA/TEGDMA based composites with different fillers for dental applicationscitations
- 2016Bond strength of a new generation of universal bonding systems to zirconia ceramiccitations
- 2016Effect of surface modifications on the bond strength of zirconia ceramic with resin cement resincitations
- 2015Ten-year clinical outcome of three-unit posterior FDPs made from a glass-infiltrated zirconia reinforced alumina ceramic (In-Ceram Zirconia)citations
- 2015Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramiccitations
- 2010CONTROLLED AIRBORNE-PARTICLE ABRASION OF ZIRCONIA CERAMIC RESTORATIONS
- 2009Surface Conditioning Influences Zirconia Ceramic Bondingcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramic
Abstract
<p>BACKGROUND: Today, many adhesive systems with different coupling agents for tooth structures and restorative materials are available. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength (TBS) of different universal adhesive systems to etched lithium disilicate ceramic.</p><p>METHODS: The authors etched and bonded 96 disk-like lithium disilicate ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) with 4 different adhesive bonding systems to Plexiglas tubes filled with a composite resin. The authors stored the specimens in water at 37°C for 3 days without thermal cycling or for 30 or 150 days with 7,500 or 37,500 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C, respectively. Then, all specimens underwent TBS testing. The authors performed statistical analysis by using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests with a Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing.</p><p>RESULTS: Initially, all adhesive systems exhibited considerable TBS, but some showed a significant reduction after 30 days of storage. After 3, 30, and 150 days, the Monobond Plus and Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent) silane-containing adhesive system showed significantly higher bond strengths to lithium disilicate ceramic than did the other universal adhesive systems, some of which do not contain silanes.</p><p>CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic is affected significantly by the adhesive bonding system used.</p><p>PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Universal adhesive systems that do not contain a silane should be avoided for bonding lithium disilicate ceramic restorations because of their inferior bond strength.</p>