| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mirzaali, Mohammad, J.
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2024Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printingcitations
- 2024Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratiocitations
- 20244D Printing for Biomedical Applicationscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterialscitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Mechanisms of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Merging strut-based and minimal surface meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Nonlinear coarse-graining models for 3D printed multi-material biomimetic compositescitations
- 2022Magneto‐/ electro‐responsive polymers toward manufacturing, characterization, and biomedical/ soft robotic applicationscitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2021Dynamic characterization of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials with tunable elastic propertiescitations
- 2021Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopycitations
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2020Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printingcitations
- 2020Magnetorheological elastomer compositescitations
- 2019Auxeticity and stiffness of random networkscitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts through laser metal deposition (LMD)citations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of metals using powder bed-based technologies
- 2019Fracture Behavior of Bio-Inspired Functionally Graded Soft–Hard Composites Made by Multi-Material 3D Printingcitations
- 2018Multi-material 3D printed mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2017Rational design of soft mechanical metamaterialscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitution
Abstract
The growing interest in multi-functional metallic biomaterials for bone substitutes challenges the current additive manufacturing (AM, =3D printing) technologies. It is foreseeable that advances in multi-material AM for metallic biomaterials will not only allow for complex geometrical designs, but also improve their multi-functionalities by tuning the types or compositions of the underlying base materials, thereby presenting unprecedented opportunities for advanced orthopedic treatments. AM technologies are yet to be extensively explored for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials, especially for bone substitutes. The aim of this review is to present the viable options of the state-of-the-art multi-material AM for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials to be used as bone substitutes. The review starts with a brief review of bone tissue engineering, the design requirements, and fabrication technologies for metallic biomaterials to highlight the advantages of using AM over conventional fabrication methods. Five AM technologies suitable for metal 3D printing are compared against the requirements for multi-material AM. Of these AM technologies, extrusion-based multi-material AM is shown to have the greatest potential to meet the requirements for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials. Finally, recent progress in the fabrication of Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials including the utilization of multi-material AM technologies is reviewed so as to identify the knowledge gaps and propose the directions of further research for the development of multi-material AM technologies that are applicable for the fabrication of multi-functional metallic biomaterials.