People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Fleck, Norman A.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2020Growth rate of lithium filaments in ceramic electrolytes
- 2020Dendrites as climbing dislocations in ceramic electrolytes: Initiation of growth
- 2020The crack growth resistance of an elastoplastic lattice
- 2020An assessment of the J-integral test for a metallic foamcitations
- 2019The role of plastic strain gradients in the crack growth resistance of metalscitations
- 2019Tensile fracture of an adhesive jointcitations
- 2019The mechanics of solid-state nanofoamingcitations
- 2019Creep failure of honeycombs made by rapid prototypingcitations
- 2019The mechanics of solid-state nanofoaming.
- 2019Mechanical Properties of PMMA-Sepiolite Nanocellular Materials with a Bimodal Cellular Structurecitations
- 2018Compressive Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of Freestanding and Composite 3D Graphitic Foamscitations
- 2017Linking Scales in Plastic Deformation and Fracture
- 2016The tensile ductility of cellular solids: the role of imperfectionscitations
- 2015Hierarchical macroscopic fibrillar adhesives: in situ study of buckling and adhesion mechanisms on wavy substrates
- 2003Near net shape fabrication of highly porous parts by powder metallurgy
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Compressive Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of Freestanding and Composite 3D Graphitic Foams
Abstract
Open-cell graphitic foams were fabricated by chemical vapor deposition using nickel templates and their compressive responses were measured over a range of relative densities. The mechanical response required an interpretation in terms of a hierarchical micromechanical model, spanning 3 distinct length scales. The power law scaling of elastic modulus and yield strength versus relative density suggests that the cell walls of the graphitic foam deform by bending. The length scale of the unit cell of the foam is set by the length of the struts comprising the cell wall, and is termed level I. The cell walls comprise hollow triangular tubes, and bending of these strut-like tubes involves axial stretching of the tube walls. This length scale is termed level II. In turn, the tube walls form a wavy stack of graphitic layers, and this waviness induces interlayer shear of the graphitic layers when the tube walls are subjected to axial stretch. The thickness of the tube wall defines the third length scale, termed level III. We show that the addition of a thin, flexible ceramic Al2O3 scaffold stiffens and strengthens the foam, yet preserves the power law scaling. The hierarchical model gives fresh insight into the mechanical properties of foams with cell walls made from emergent 2D layered solids.